blob: c50b00705913bf86811032602d49bc904d7d7f84 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
|
# If both a static and a dynamic TCH/H (even without pchan switch!) are available, we always prefer static TS.
create-bts trx-count 1 timeslots c+s4 dyn TCH/H dyn TCH/H dyn TCH/H PDCH
network
bts 0
channel allocator ascending
set-ts-use trx 0 0 states * TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H *
# the dynamic timeslot is already in TCH/H mode, and needs no pchan switch. It appears first in the list, hence it would
# be used first -- but we prefer using static TS when still available:
create-ms bts 0 TCH/H AMR
expect-ts-use trx 0 0 states * TCH/-H TCH/HH TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H *
# ^
# Interference ratings do NOT influence whether a static or dynamic lchan (even without pchan switch) is going to be
# assigned.
network
bts 0
channel allocator avoid-interference 1
interference-meas level-bounds -115 -109 -103 -97 -91 -85
# 0 1 2 3 4 5
# Here the dyn TS lchan happens to have less interference. But still the choice to prefer static over dynamic weighs
# stronger. The static TS with least interference is picked.
# dyn TCH/H dyn TCH/H dyn TCH/H
expect-ts-use trx 0 0 states * TCH/-H TCH/HH TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H *
res-ind trx 0 0 levels - 4- -- 1- 4- 3- 2- -
create-ms bts 0 TCH/H AMR
expect-ts-use trx 0 0 states * TCH/-H TCH/HH TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/HH *
# ^
create-ms bts 0 TCH/H AMR
expect-ts-use trx 0 0 states * TCH/-H TCH/HH TCH/-H TCH/HH TCH/-H TCH/HH *
# ^
# now only dynamic TS are left. The one dyn lchan with least interference is picked
create-ms bts 0 TCH/H AMR
expect-ts-use trx 0 0 states * TCH/-H TCH/HH TCH/HH TCH/HH TCH/-H TCH/HH *
# ^
|
