From 597f4b28bbe12866bcec241b1be53aa011c018c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bill Meier Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:18:30 +0000 Subject: Remove an XXX comment; svn path=/trunk/; revision=36941 --- epan/dissectors/packet-lisp.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'epan/dissectors/packet-lisp.c') diff --git a/epan/dissectors/packet-lisp.c b/epan/dissectors/packet-lisp.c index 34a3244565..9ece880257 100644 --- a/epan/dissectors/packet-lisp.c +++ b/epan/dissectors/packet-lisp.c @@ -858,8 +858,6 @@ dissect_lisp(tvbuff_t *tvb, packet_info *pinfo, proto_tree *tree) /* Sub-dissectors are indirectly called by the following and thus this code should be executed whether or not tree==NULL. - XXX: Is it acceptable to use 'if (tree)' in the cases where - only the data dissector is indirectly called ? */ switch (type) { case LISP_MAP_REQUEST: -- cgit v1.2.3