From 312bb1068257e93981957cdd51323ab565984ba3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Darius Davis Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 13:57:33 +1000 Subject: DHCP: Fix RFC 4578 erratum number. The link to the erratum for RFC 4578 is wrong -- I probably accidentally hit Ctrl+A in Vim insert mode and incremented it. This trivial comments-only change corrects the erratum ID from 4625 to 4624. Change-Id: If0495b7900ce4dbf63328a4568d04f8407012c10 Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/30412 Reviewed-by: Anders Broman --- epan/dissectors/packet-dhcp.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'epan/dissectors/packet-dhcp.c') diff --git a/epan/dissectors/packet-dhcp.c b/epan/dissectors/packet-dhcp.c index 882159a3d2..987a4296dc 100644 --- a/epan/dissectors/packet-dhcp.c +++ b/epan/dissectors/packet-dhcp.c @@ -1121,8 +1121,8 @@ static const value_string dhcp_nbnt_vals[] = { * EFI Byte Code (EFI BC, EBC) was 7 in RFC 4578, but is assigned 9 by IETF. * EFI x64 was 9 in RFC 4578, but is assigned 7 by IETF. * - * For confirmation, refer to RFC erratum 4625: - * https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4625 + * For confirmation, refer to RFC erratum 4624: + * https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4624 */ static const value_string dhcp_client_arch[] = { { 0x0000, "IA x86 PC" }, -- cgit v1.2.3