| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
This adds the ability for a Lua script to register expert info fields,
similar to C-code dissectors. This change also removes the need for
the expert_add_info_format_internal() function. Existing Lua scripts
do not have to change, because the existing expert info function
uses the internal "_ws.lua" protocol instead of nothing; but using
the new functionality provides more benefits since it correctly
registers the expert info fields to the dissector's protocol.
The test suite was amended to generate both old and new forms.
Change-Id: Ib5ae74e927cfa81312baf7b04ff4104b0b4f936e
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/830
Reviewed-by: Evan Huus <eapache@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Anders Broman <a.broman58@gmail.com>
|
|
This adds the ability for Lua scripts to register heuristic dissectors
for any protocol that has registered a heuristic dissector list, such
as UDP, TCP, and ~50 others. The Lua function can also establish a
conversation tied to its Proto dissector, to avoid having to check the
heuristics for the same flow. The example dissector in the testsuite
has also been enhanced to include a heuristic dissector, to verify
the functionality and provide an example implementation.
Change-Id: Ie232602779f43d3418fe8db09c61d5fc0b59597a
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/576
Reviewed-by: Anders Broman <a.broman58@gmail.com>
|
|
As discussed in bug 3513 and 9709, one can register more than one new ProtoFields for
the same field name. Of course C-code can do that too, and does a LOT apparently, but
if they're not similar ftypes then things can get scrweed up in display filters.
So this change prevents duplicate field registration of dissimilar ftypes. The
similarity is based on the discussion on the mailing list, and the listing in
README.developer has been updated to refelect that as well.
Also, this change adds a testscript for Proto/ProtoFields.
Change-Id: I43bd323f785245941a21289647332a19adec2a9d
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/285
Reviewed-by: Evan Huus <eapache@gmail.com>
|
