| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Hopefully that name makes it clear what the routiner's purpose is, and
will encourage people to use it rather than using dissector_add_uint()
with a bogus integer value.
Change-Id: Ic5be456d0ad40b176aab01712ab7b13aed5de2a8
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/2483
Reviewed-by: Guy Harris <guy@alum.mit.edu>
|
|
Change-Id: I58aa249d73ab44f5f56b1559b38b216cdb542ecb
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/1280
Reviewed-by: Evan Huus <eapache@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Anders Broman <a.broman58@gmail.com>
|
|
- Remove unneeded #includes;
- Move proto_reg_handoff...(() to the end of the file as per convention;
- Use dissector_add_handle() instead of using dissector_add_uint(..., 0, ...);
- #if 0 an unused global function (which caused a [-Wmissing-prototypes] warning);
- Remove an empty proto_reg-handoff...();
- 'if (already_registered)' not required in one case.
Change-Id: I74f267c2721df13eb4d52d7f19a6ded423218a39
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/1277
Reviewed-by: Bill Meier <wmeier@newsguy.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I859597ebc957a58f659800ef63318f94e80feabf
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/1104
Reviewed-by: Anders Broman <a.broman58@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: If8fcfe1971c8863f370e440f64c36eb7566f6852
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/113
Reviewed-by: Michael Mann <mmann78@netscape.net>
|
