Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
since both get_rose_ctx() and get_asn1_ctx() also check signatures.
svn path=/trunk/; revision=53965
|
|
svn path=/trunk/; revision=53860
|
|
svn path=/trunk/; revision=53061
|
|
was done using textual search+replace, not anything syntax-aware, so presumably
it got most comments as well (except where there were typos).
Use a consistent coding style, and make proper use of the WS_DLL_* defines.
Group the functions appropriately in the header.
I ended up getting rid of most of the explanatory comments since many of them
duplicated what was in the value_string.c file (and were out of sync with the
recent updates I made to those in r48633). Presumably most of the comments
should be in the .h file not the .c file, but there's enough churn ahead that
it's not worth fixing yet.
Part of https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8467
svn path=/trunk/; revision=48634
|
|
svn path=/trunk/; revision=48478
|
|
The misspellings were mostly in comments but some were
in text strings visible to the user.
svn path=/trunk/; revision=47899
|
|
svn path=/trunk/; revision=47746
|
|
svn path=/trunk/; revision=47738
|
|
svn path=/trunk/; revision=47717
|
|
svn path=/trunk/; revision=47716
|
|
svn path=/trunk/; revision=47714
|
|
dissected as QSIG or ETSI.
Add the ISUP Supplementary services dissector.
svn path=/trunk/; revision=47713
|
|
use native line endings.
svn path=/trunk/; revision=47709
|
|
svn path=/trunk/; revision=47706
|