Rev 29427 added packet_add_new_data_source() with a comment indicating that

the data source does not need to be allocated if (!tree).

Rev 30158 took the if (!tree) check out indicating that the check was invalid.

So: (since packet_add_new_data_source() now only calls add_new_data_source()),
remove packet_add_new_data_source().

svn path=/trunk/; revision=34717

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/print.c b/print.c
index ad67e0a868..010e52eecd 100644
--- a/print.c
+++ b/print.c
@@ -245,10 +245,6 @@ proto_tree_write_pdml(epan_dissect_t *edt, FILE *fh)
 	data.src_list = edt->pi.data_src;
 	data.edt = edt;
 
-	/* We shouldn't be called with a NULL pointer here because we've
-	 * created a visible protocol tree */
-	g_assert(data.src_list);
-
 	fprintf(fh, "<packet>\n");
 
 	/* Print a "geninfo" protocol as required by PDML */
@@ -799,10 +795,6 @@ print_hex_data(print_stream_t *stream, epan_dissect_t *edt)
 	const guchar *cp;
 	guint length;
 
-	/* We shouldn't be called with a NULL pointer here because we've
-	 * created a visible protocol tree */
-	g_assert(edt->pi.data_src);
-
 	/*
 	 * Set "multiple_sources" iff this frame has more than one
 	 * data source; if it does, we need to print the name of