diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | msc/MSC_Tests.ttcn | 54 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | msc/expected-results.xml | 1 |
2 files changed, 55 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/msc/MSC_Tests.ttcn b/msc/MSC_Tests.ttcn index 05d6b4f6..7b8740c0 100644 --- a/msc/MSC_Tests.ttcn +++ b/msc/MSC_Tests.ttcn @@ -2163,6 +2163,59 @@ testcase TC_lu_and_ussd_single_req() runs on MTC_CT { vc_conn.done; } +private function f_tc_lu_and_ussd_wrong_code(charstring id, BSC_ConnHdlrPars pars) +runs on BSC_ConnHdlr { + f_init_handler(pars); + + /* Perform location update */ + f_perform_lu(); + + /* Send CM Service Request for SS/USSD */ + f_establish_fully(EST_TYPE_SS_ACT); + + /* Compose a new SS/REGISTER message with request */ + var template (value) PDU_ML3_MS_NW ussd_req := ts_ML3_MO_SS_REGISTER( + tid := 1, /* We just need a single transaction */ + ti_flag := c_TIF_ORIG, /* Sent from the side that originates the TI */ + facility := f_USSD_FACILITY_IE_INVOKE( + invoke_id := 5, /* Phone may not start from 0 or 1 */ + op_code := SS_OP_CODE_PROCESS_USS_REQ, + ussd_string := "*#999#" + ) + ); + + /* Compose SS/RELEASE_COMPLETE template with expected response */ + var template PDU_ML3_NW_MS ussd_rsp := tr_ML3_MT_SS_RELEASE_COMPLETE( + tid := 1, /* Response should arrive within the same transaction */ + ti_flag := c_TIF_REPL, /* Sent to the side that originates the TI */ + facility := f_USSD_FACILITY_IE_RETURN_ERROR( + invoke_id := 5, /* InvokeID shall be the same for both REQ and RSP */ + err_code := SS_ERR_CODE_UNEXPECTED_DATA_VALUE + ) + ); + + /* Request own number request */ + BSSAP.send(ts_PDU_DTAP_MO(ussd_req)); + alt { + /* We expect RELEASE_COMPLETE message with the response */ + [] BSSAP.receive(tr_PDU_DTAP_MT(ussd_rsp)) { + setverdict(pass); + } + [] BSSAP.receive { + setverdict(fail, "Unknown/unexpected BSSAP received"); + self.stop; + } + } + + f_expect_clear(); +} +testcase TC_lu_and_ussd_wrong_code() runs on MTC_CT { + var BSC_ConnHdlr vc_conn; + f_init(); + vc_conn := f_start_handler(refers(f_tc_lu_and_ussd_wrong_code), 47); + vc_conn.done; +} + /* TODO (SMS): * different user data lengths * SMPP transaction mode with unsuccessful delivery @@ -2245,6 +2298,7 @@ control { execute( TC_smpp_mt_sms() ); execute( TC_lu_and_ussd_single_req() ); + execute( TC_lu_and_ussd_wrong_code() ); /* Run this last: at the time of writing this test crashes the MSC */ execute( TC_lu_imsi_auth_tmsi_encr_3_1_log_msc_debug() ); diff --git a/msc/expected-results.xml b/msc/expected-results.xml index ac18fdee..69f2e283 100644 --- a/msc/expected-results.xml +++ b/msc/expected-results.xml @@ -72,4 +72,5 @@ <testcase classname='MSC_Tests' name='TC_smpp_mt_sms' time='MASKED'/> <testcase classname='MSC_Tests' name='TC_lu_imsi_auth_tmsi_encr_3_1_log_msc_debug' time='MASKED'/> <testcase classname='MSC_Tests' name='TC_lu_and_ussd_single_req' time='MASKED'/> + <testcase classname='MSC_Tests' name='TC_lu_and_ussd_wrong_code' time='MASKED'/> </testsuite> |