diff options
| author | Neels Hofmeyr <neels@hofmeyr.de> | 2018-11-07 00:35:06 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Neels Hofmeyr <nhofmeyr@sysmocom.de> | 2018-11-14 16:17:39 +0000 |
| commit | 4ed9edf5b906883d73de061442f139cd06dbb571 (patch) | |
| tree | bdbaa0116ed8ab3c4712bcb76a93a3aa9b26145f | |
| parent | f44ccd1af242e25d8fefacd3e2433b99361e4c08 (diff) | |
bsc: TC_chan_act_ack_est_ind_noreply: use f_expect_chan_rel
Instead of placing an own set of channel release expectations, just use the
common f_expect_chan_rel() that exists for exactly this purpose.
This will also be in line with upcoming changes to tighten checking of the
lchan release messages.
Related: OS#3413
Change-Id: Ib7dd886472337e2deb968e6f9de6cecdb7855319
| -rw-r--r-- | bsc/BSC_Tests.ttcn | 10 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/bsc/BSC_Tests.ttcn b/bsc/BSC_Tests.ttcn index 551ffe05..a2a33783 100644 --- a/bsc/BSC_Tests.ttcn +++ b/bsc/BSC_Tests.ttcn @@ -429,15 +429,7 @@ testcase TC_chan_act_ack_est_ind_noreply() runs on test_CT { /* expect BSC to disable the channel again if there's no response from MSC */ /* MS waits 20s (T3210) at LU; 10s (T3230) at CM SERV REQ and 5s (T3220) AT detach */ - IPA_RSL[0].clear; - alt { - [] IPA_RSL[0].receive(tr_ASP_RSL_UD(sid, tr_RSL_MsgTypeD(RSL_MT_RF_CHAN_REL))) -> value rx_rsl_ud { } - [] IPA_RSL[0].receive(tr_ASP_RSL_UD(sid, tr_RSL_REL_REQ(chan_nr, ?))) -> value rx_rsl_ud { - f_ipa_tx(0, ts_RSL_REL_CONF(chan_nr, main_dcch)); - repeat; - } - } - + f_expect_chan_rel(0, chan_nr); setverdict(pass); } |