From 91f587ed98e40bd138049102d78181aaa97f4ebd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Holger Hans Peter Freyther <zecke@selfish.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:12:13 +0100
Subject: misc: Make clang --analyze happy with the source code

The compiler concludes that if (ts->type == type && ts->line && line
can be false as line is NULL and then we unconditionally access
it, make it happy by adding an extra NULL check.
---
 openbsc/src/e1_input.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'openbsc')

diff --git a/openbsc/src/e1_input.c b/openbsc/src/e1_input.c
index 8dce1322a..a17ae415d 100644
--- a/openbsc/src/e1_input.c
+++ b/openbsc/src/e1_input.c
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ int e1inp_ts_config(struct e1inp_ts *ts, struct e1inp_line *line,
 
 	switch (type) {
 	case E1INP_TS_TYPE_SIGN:
-		if (line->driver)
+		if (line && line->driver)
 			ts->sign.delay = line->driver->default_delay;
 		else
 			ts->sign.delay = 100000;
-- 
cgit v1.2.3