| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Add a test for EGPRS two phase access based on RA caps.
Add a test for DL TBFs where data block are encoded with each MCS.
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
|
|
Currently the window size is fixed to 64 even for EGPRS.
Support dynamic window sizes depending on the number of PDCH. The
WS can be set to b + f * N_PDCH. If the result is not valid according
to TS 44.060, Table 9.1.9.2.1, the value will be corrected to use the
next lower valid value (or 64).
The following VTY commands are added (config-pcu node):
window-size <0-1024> set base (b) value and leave f unchanged
window-size <0-1024> <0-256> set base (b) and factor (f)
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
|
|
Currently the plain 'egprs' command enables EGPRS but doesn't prevent
phones from being served in GPRS mode if they do not support EGPRS.
This involves complex frame allocation implementations in dynamic
mode, especially if 8PSK is being used. This is due to the inability
of non-EGPRS phone to decode 8PSK USF and ES/P altogether. Since
polling has a higher priority than USF, collisions will have to be
prevented by the PCU by never using an GPRS USF if it refers to a FN
that is already being used for polling.
This commit just disables mixed usage by ignoring GPRS-only request
if EGPRS is enabled.
The following VTY command (config-pcu node) is changed:
egprs -> egprs only
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
|
|
Some test function don't have the "=== start/end ===" printfs.
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
|
|
This tests the usage of an existing TBF that is no longer in FLOW
state to request a new DL TBF via the old TBF's PACCH.
The test triggers a bug that breaks the association between both TBF
objects, resulting in packet loss and transmission stalling.
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
|
|
This adds tests for
- RA update with RACH for the RAUpdateComplete message
- RACH for UL while DL is active (LLC queue not empty)
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
|
|
To avoid the need for a switch or conditional statement when needing
a TBF from an MS object in direction independant code, this method
contains that case distinction. For additional flexibility, a
reverse() function is added to get the opposite direction.
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
|
|
Currently LLC frames are lost or even reordered when the TBF has be
established via the AGCH and the procedure fails for some reason.
This test tries to reproduce this behaviour by throwing away the
first TBF while calling the handle() method several times. The
results of create_dl_acked_block() are checked against expected
values (this is currently party disabled because the bug still
persists).
Ticket: #1759
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
|
|
These tests cover the message exchange from receiving from the first
RACH request to the first data block when establishing an uplink TBF.
This will be used to check, whether TA and other values are passed to
an MS object correctly.
In addition, the RX RACH log message in rcv_rach is extended to
contain the single block fn.
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
|
|
Currently the IMSI is stored in the TBFs. Since it directly refers to
an MS, it should rather be stored in an MS object.
This patch move the m_imsi field from gprs_rlcmac_tbf to GprsMs,
changes gprs_rlcmac_tbf::imsi() to get the IMSI from the associated
MS object, and adds getter and setter to GprsMs. Before changing the
IMSI of the associated MS object, assign_imsi() checks if there is
already another MS object with the same IMSI and eventually resets
the IMSI of that one. So using update_ms() and assign_imsi() ensures
that there are not two MS object entries is the storage with the
same TLLI or the same IMSI.
Ticket: #1674
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
|
|
This test calls gprs_rlcmac_dl_tbf::handle() with varying TLLI and
IMSI until the function fails.
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
|
|
This tests checks the implementation of the delayed release of an
downlink TBF.
Ticket: #556
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
|
|
During a routing area update a new P-TMSI was assigned. During
the PACKET CONTROL ACK on the DL we notice the change of TLLI
but didn't propagate this. This means that a Routing Area Update
Complete was only sent after a new RACH request.
Addresses:
<0007> gprs_rlcmac_meas.cpp:103 UL RSSI of TLLI=0x88661bc6: -67 dBm
<0002> bts.cpp:945 Got ACK, but UL TBF is gone TLLI=0xe512eba3
<0007> gprs_rlcmac_meas.cpp:158 DL packet loss of IMSI=274080000004765 / TLLI=0xe512eba3: 0%
<0002> tbf.cpp:668 TBF TFI=0 TLLI=0x88661bc6 T3169 timeout during transsmission
<0002> tbf.cpp:690 - Assignment was on PACCH
<0002> tbf.cpp:694 - No uplink data received yet
|
