Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Related: OS#5020
Fixes: 81c549d5be1f5e161d6231d3f2e5fb4aa3b0557c
Change-Id: Iad8e50b856009439d78c596c5b54dc3e9836e1d4
|
|
pdch object is obtained prior in the stack so it is available for
logging.
Change-Id: If51f7bdbd626a44c7b8e182a3460dad49fda6ec3
|
|
Since recently (see Depends below), BTS side submits DATA.ind with len=0
to announce nothing was received on that UL block FN. This will allow
osmo-pcu track time more accurately, and use this information to quickly
find out if a UL block was expected as requested by RRBP or USF poll and
increment counters such as N3101 (finally being able to properly
implement timers such as T3619).
This patch does the same for direct phy feature, where the osmo-pcu
process receives the DATA.ind directly from the DSP.
Depends: osmo-bts.git Change-Id I343c7a721dab72411edbca816c8864926bc329fb
Related: OS#5033
Change-Id: I9a835e16ef0e5a68c003a93d1a33233aa43464ae
|
|
This patch doesn't really tests whether osmo-pcu can work on a multi-bts
environment, but it prepares the data structures to be able to do so at
any later point in time.
Change-Id: I6b10913f46c19d438c4e250a436a7446694b725a
|
|
Change-Id: I8abd4c50b172f6b312bb4ba3c29e74396f6e6b93
|
|
In [1] I restricted L1 SAPI of PH-RA.ind to PDTCH and PTCCH, and
this seems to have caused a regression reported in [2]:
DL1IF ERROR sysmo_l1_if.c:251 Rx PH-RA.ind for unknown L1 SAPI PRACH
I assumed that PH-RA.ind belonging to a Control Acknowledgement
message (in format of 4 Access Bursts) would have PDTCH SAPI,
while apparently it's actually arriving on PRACH.
[1] I482d60a46b9d253dfe0b16140eac9fea6420b30c
[2] https://osmocom.org/issues/1526#note-39
Change-Id: Ib0a6da37de7a1db4cad2b96293b31b9f32e7d9eb
Related: OS#1526
|
|
This is not a functional change, just fixing misleading function
name. Access Bursts on PTCCH/U have nothing to do with PDTCH.
Change-Id: I4ab710ba026315301cc6970263967616401a9fc8
|
|
New define is available since libosmocore 1.1.0, and we already require
1.3.0, so no need to update dependenices.
Let's change it to avoid people re-using old BSC_FD_* symbols when
copy-pasting somewhere else.
Change-Id: Ida8fd3bd7347163567acde34ad67aefee913b0ea
|
|
Change-Id: I482d60a46b9d253dfe0b16140eac9fea6420b30c
Related: OS#1545
|
|
Change-Id: Ib204acce1a7e33f6651b9da2a7b4a9b9ae461093
Related: OS#1545
|
|
Change-Id: I95ced5da1c89dae5a16963b10b005747277f320b
|
|
Don't try to send custom alarms that weren't included in upstream.
Change-Id: I51de826aa732a3875d75396b46b7d2821ef7417c
|
|
From-Commit: 960aa3d1b0b1
From-Remote: https://gitlab.com/nrw_noa/osmo-pcu
Change-Id: Ia526f712b95eb7bba99252f2a348d9fb5d2f3838
|
|
Problem:
TA provided from L1 PH-DATA-IND is a relative amount of TA adjustment to actual TA
being used for given TBF. The current TA update algorithm in PCU simply applies the relative
amount of TA to given TBF but does not take into account of current TA.
As a result, the PCU will request wrong TA jump for given TBF if the MS is moving away from
BTS more than 2 km.
Related issue: http://osmocom.org/issues/2611
Fixes:
- The PCU needs increase or decrease current TA of given TBF on receiving of relative
amount of TA adjustment provided by PH-DATA-IND from L1.
- The PCU needs to set absolute TA of given TBF on receiving absolute TA provided by
PH-RA-IND from L1.
From-Commit: 139ad3f42193
From-Remote: https://gitlab.com/nrw_noa/osmo-pcu
Change-Id: I7665586dd5722bbe04632ee5673d3033bc082324
|
|
From-Commit: a9eefb54c62a
From-Remote: https://gitlab.com/nrw_noa/osmo-pcu
Change-Id: Ida0592c9da74588a57d9d2d5be40fcf79edcb596
|
|
From-Commit: b77fd00608dd
From-Remote: https://gitlab.com/nrw_noa/osmo-pcu
Change-Id: I7cd89a549c9463e81893ca7dd925299f728e4453
|