diff options
| author | Pau Espin Pedrol <pespin@sysmocom.de> | 2023-07-27 21:42:01 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Pau Espin Pedrol <pespin@sysmocom.de> | 2023-08-21 11:19:50 +0200 |
| commit | 441768a82396ec14ee37fde65801b65f87051b90 (patch) | |
| tree | 02120ca0bc10f04f999e07a6e199d9f7729173c8 /tests/alloc/AllocTest.ok | |
| parent | 60664a4df16a96df2eff462aff6f085c875d7551 (diff) | |
WIP: Assume MultiSlot Class 1 if unknownpespin/bsn
Until now, if timeslot resources where being allocated for an MS for
which its msclass is not known, msclass=12 was being selected.
While it's true that msclass=12 is quite a usual one implemented by
phones (Rx=4, Rx=4, Sum=5), some MS implementations may not support such
modes.
As a result, if the PCU allocates a TBF for an MS which its msclass is
not known (eg. because it used 1-phase access aka no Pkt Res Req), then
a minimal msclass=1 must be assumed. Otherwise, it may assign more
multislots than the MS can handle, and will work incorrectly since an
amount of RLC/MAC blocks won't be sent/received properly.
Test output changes in MslotTest.ok are expected since some allocations
are accumulative, and ms_class=0 is called the first one.
TbfTest.err changes happen in test_ms_merge_dl_tbf_different_trx().
Change-Id: If80fdd793db7dad029faa83dbf980ffc4959e2e5
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/alloc/AllocTest.ok')
| -rw-r--r-- | tests/alloc/AllocTest.ok | 44 |
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 26 deletions
diff --git a/tests/alloc/AllocTest.ok b/tests/alloc/AllocTest.ok index bad9a488..1f1ae876 100644 --- a/tests/alloc/AllocTest.ok +++ b/tests/alloc/AllocTest.ok @@ -4,37 +4,29 @@ Testing alloc_a direction(0) Testing alloc_a direction(1) Going to test multislot assignment MS_CLASS=0 Testing UL then DL assignment. -PDCH[6] is used for UL -PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=6) is control_ts for UL -PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=6) is first common for UL +PDCH[5] is used for UL +PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=5) is control_ts for UL +PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=5) is first common for UL PDCH[5] is used for DL -PDCH[6] is used for DL -PDCH[7] is used for DL -PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=6) is control_ts for DL -PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=6) is first common for DL +PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=5) is control_ts for DL +PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=5) is first common for DL Testing DL then UL assignment followed by update -PDCH[6] is used for DL -PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=6) is control_ts for DL -PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=6) is first common for DL -PDCH[6] is used for UL -PDCH[7] is used for UL -PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=6) is control_ts for UL -PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=6) is first common for UL PDCH[5] is used for DL -PDCH[6] is used for DL -PDCH[7] is used for DL -PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=6) is control_ts for DL -PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=6) is first common for DL +PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=5) is control_ts for DL +PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=5) is first common for DL +PDCH[5] is used for UL +PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=5) is control_ts for UL +PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=5) is first common for UL +PDCH[5] is used for DL +PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=5) is control_ts for DL +PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=5) is first common for DL Testing jolly example -PDCH[3] is used for UL -PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=3) is control_ts for UL -PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=3) is first common for UL +PDCH[1] is used for UL +PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=1) is control_ts for UL +PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=1) is first common for UL PDCH[1] is used for DL -PDCH[2] is used for DL -PDCH[3] is used for DL -PDCH[4] is used for DL -PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=3) is control_ts for DL -PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=3) is first common for DL +PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=1) is control_ts for DL +PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=1) is first common for DL Going to test multislot assignment MS_CLASS=1 Testing UL then DL assignment. PDCH[5] is used for UL |