diff options
| author | Jacob Erlbeck <jerlbeck@sysmocom.de> | 2015-06-22 16:14:23 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jacob Erlbeck <jerlbeck@sysmocom.de> | 2015-07-07 09:35:26 +0200 |
| commit | ea65c72d069c279951c022daf337d99e3aaa670a (patch) | |
| tree | 1dae0f02adb87becb78076e8c0f7e175e3c86a20 /tests/alloc/AllocTest.cpp | |
| parent | c91c18e6ef9ee5fca3d10b57ebddf211d3655a8d (diff) | |
alloc: Replace Algorithm B implementation
The current implementation always starts the downlink slot allocation
with the first possible slot, depending on which channels are enabled
and which multislot class is offered by the MS. So in configurations
with many (>4) PDCH, some PDCH are not really used.
The new implementation introduced by this commit differs as follows:
- The reservation mechanism provided by GprsMs is used to avoid
incompatibilities is used in the same way like algo A does. This
basically means, that the allocation is done once when the first
TBF is requested and then used until all TBF have been released.
- All combinations of Rx and Tx slots are checked for compatibility
with the multiscot class. Basically the combination with the most
usable PDCH and the least number of reservations is used.
- Only one UL slots is provided.
- Tta and Tra are checked.
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/alloc/AllocTest.cpp')
| -rw-r--r-- | tests/alloc/AllocTest.cpp | 14 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/tests/alloc/AllocTest.cpp b/tests/alloc/AllocTest.cpp index b918132c..187b88a8 100644 --- a/tests/alloc/AllocTest.cpp +++ b/tests/alloc/AllocTest.cpp @@ -565,18 +565,18 @@ static void test_successive_allocation() test_successive_allocation(alloc_algorithm_a, 1, 1, TEST_MODE_UL_AND_DL, 32, "algorithm A (UL and DL)"); test_successive_allocation(alloc_algorithm_b, 10, 10, TEST_MODE_UL_AND_DL, - 7, "algorithm B class 10 (UL and DL)"); + 32, "algorithm B class 10 (UL and DL)"); test_successive_allocation(alloc_algorithm_b, 12, 12, TEST_MODE_UL_AND_DL, - 7, "algorithm B class 12 (UL and DL)"); + 29, "algorithm B class 12 (UL and DL)"); test_successive_allocation(alloc_algorithm_b, 1, 12, TEST_MODE_UL_AND_DL, - 14, "algorithm B class 1-12 (UL and DL)"); + 31, "algorithm B class 1-12 (UL and DL)"); test_successive_allocation(alloc_algorithm_b, 1, 29, TEST_MODE_UL_AND_DL, - 18, "algorithm B class 1-29 (UL and DL)"); + 24, "algorithm B class 1-29 (UL and DL)"); test_successive_allocation(alloc_algorithm_a, 1, 1, TEST_MODE_DL_AND_UL, 32, "algorithm A (DL and UL)"); test_successive_allocation(alloc_algorithm_b, 10, 10, TEST_MODE_DL_AND_UL, - 7, "algorithm B class 10 (DL and UL)"); + 15, "algorithm B class 10 (DL and UL)"); test_successive_allocation(alloc_algorithm_a, 1, 1, TEST_MODE_DL_AFTER_UL, 32, "algorithm A (DL after UL)"); @@ -586,12 +586,12 @@ static void test_successive_allocation() test_successive_allocation(alloc_algorithm_a, 1, 1, TEST_MODE_UL_AFTER_DL, 32, "algorithm A (UL after DL)"); test_successive_allocation(alloc_algorithm_b, 10, 10, TEST_MODE_UL_AFTER_DL, - 7, "algorithm B class 10 (UL after DL)"); + 32, "algorithm B class 10 (UL after DL)"); test_successive_allocation(alloc_algorithm_a, 1, 1, TEST_MODE_UL_ONLY, 32, "algorithm A (UL only)"); test_successive_allocation(alloc_algorithm_b, 10, 10, TEST_MODE_UL_ONLY, - 7, "algorithm B class 10 (UL only)"); + 32, "algorithm B class 10 (UL only)"); test_successive_allocation(alloc_algorithm_a, 1, 1, TEST_MODE_DL_ONLY, 32, "algorithm A (DL ONLY)"); |