aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/libmsc/ran_msg_a.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2019-11-19Fix some typosMartin Hauke1-2/+2
Fix typos and common misspellings in code comments and log messages. Change-Id: Ie66b89065f2100c1d2125ce5a6c9b1d58df7c8ad
2019-11-05BSSMAP: decode Codec List (BSS Supported)Neels Hofmeyr1-0/+30
Actually decode the Codec List (BSS Supported) in BSSMAP, in both the Complete Layer 3 Information and the Assignment Complete messages. An upcoming patch improves codec negotiation and requires the BSS supported codecs, which are so far ignored (which is/was a pity as osmo-bsc goes at great lengths to compose those IEs). Change-Id: I66c735c79e982388f06b5de783aa584c9d13569e
2019-11-01use osmo_sockaddr_str_is_nonzero()Neels Hofmeyr1-3/+3
Also regard an RTP port as invalid if the IP address is 0.0.0.0. Achieve this by using osmo_sockaddr_str_is_nonzero() instead of osmo_sockaddr_str_is_set(). Depends: I73cbcab90cffcdc9a5f8d5281c57c1f87b2c3550 (libosmocore) Change-Id: I53ddb19a70fda3deb906464e1b89c12d9b4c7cbd
2019-10-29log: ran_msg_a: tweak a message nameNeels Hofmeyr1-1/+1
Change-Id: I691025cb957e9b87c8af2dc8eb741dcba6ca26e2
2019-10-29BSSMAP log tweakNeels Hofmeyr1-1/+1
Before: RAN decode: BSSMAP: Rx BSSMAP DT1 COMPLETE LAYER 3 After: RAN decode: BSSMAP: COMPLETE LAYER 3 This caught my attention while I was writing up a script to parse osmo-msc logging to produce ladder diagrams. Change-Id: I387dde8f2eb3edb35d22ce52dc0ed580978dea36
2019-09-18fix error on BSSMAP Cipher Mode Complete L3 msg IENeels Hofmeyr1-11/+3
When an MS returns the IMEISV in the BSSMAP Cipher Mode Complete message in the Layer 3 Message Contents IE, do not re-invoke the decode_cb() a second time, but instead point to it from the ran_msg.cipher_mode_complete struct. When the MSC-A decodes the Ciphering Mode Complete message, it always wants to also decode the enclosed DTAP from the Layer 3 Message Contents IE. However, when the MSC-I preliminarily decodes messages, it often just wants to identify specific messages without fully acting on them, let alone dispatching RAN_UP_L2 events more than once. So leave it up to the supplied decode_cb passed to ran_dec_l2() implementations to decide whether to decode the DTAP. In msc_a.c hence evaluate the DTAP by passing a msgb to msc_a_up_l3(), which will evaluate the RR Ciphering Mode Complete message found in the BSSMAP Cipher Mode Complete's Layer 3 Message Contents IE. Particularly, the previous choice of calling the decode_cb a second time for the enclosed DTAP caused a header/length parsing error: the second decode_cb call tried to mimick DTAP by overwriting the l3h pointer and truncating the length of the msgb, but subsequently ran_a_decode_l2() would again derive the l3h from the l2h, obliterating the intended re-interpretation as DTAP, and hence the previous truncation caused error messages on each and every Cipher Mode Complete message, like: DBSSAP ERROR libmsc/ran_msg_a.c:764 msc_a(IMSI-26242340300XXXX:MSISDN-XXXX:TMSI-0xA73E055A:GERAN-A-77923:LU)[0x5563947521e0]{MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: RAN decode: BSSMAP: BSSMAP data truncated, discarding message This error was seen a lot at CCCamp2019. Modifying the msgb was a bad idea to begin with, the approach taken in this patch is much cleaner. Note that apparently many phones include the IMEISV in the Cipher Mode Complete message even though the BSSMAP Cipher Mode Command did not include the Cipher Response Mode IE. So, even though we did not specifically ask for the Cipher Mode Complete to include any identity, many MS default to including the IMEISV of their own accord. Reproduce: attach to osmo-msc with ciphering enabled using a Samsung Galaxy S4mini. Related: OS#4168 Change-Id: Icd8dad18d6dda24d075dd8da72c3d6db1302090d
2019-09-03ran_dec logging: log message sizes on errorsNeels Hofmeyr1-3/+7
Change-Id: Id08e4ee5a4dbf552dbb107d8f0519110664f6acb
2019-05-21Request Osmux CID and forward it in Assign Req and Assign ComplPau Espin Pedrol1-1/+22
Related: OS#2551 Depends: osmo-mgw.git I73b4c62baf39050da81d65553cbea07bc51163de Change-Id: I5b14e34481e890669c9ee02dba81eba84293cebb
2019-05-19a_iface: Announce Osmux support on RESET (ACK) sendPau Espin Pedrol1-2/+24
Related: OS#2551 Depends: libosmocore.git I28f83e2e32b9533c99e65ccc1562900ac2aec74e Change-Id: Id607f60749e923755cb38179bc283a7957670653
2019-05-13libmsc/ran_msg_a.c: prevent chosen_encryption->key buffer overrunVadim Yanitskiy1-1/+3
In ran_a_make_handover_request() we do prevent destination buffer (r.encryption_information.key) overflow, but not source buffer (n->geran.chosen_encryption->key) overrun if an incorrect key length is received. Let's fix this. Change-Id: I278bb72660634c2d535e1bd3d7fce5696da23575 Fixes: CID#198450 Out-of-bounds access
2019-05-13libmsc/ran_msg_a.c: refactor ran_a_decode_lcls_notification()Vadim Yanitskiy1-10/+3
We basically need to make sure that one of two possible IEs is not NULL, while another is NULL (eXclusive OR). This can be done using at least two conditional branches. Change-Id: Ie0f9b5c1bbbfb744e0615da07d76037d91b0abc8 Fixes: CID#198444 Logically dead code
2019-05-13libmsc/ran_msg_a.c: avoid ternary operator in struct initializationVadim Yanitskiy1-3/+1
For some reason, having ternary operator there makes Coverity think that 'n->geran.chosen_encryption' is dereferenced before checking against NULL. Let's make it happy, and move the assignment. Change-Id: I95051d0f02e2fdd3ec8da3a506109e7b23e99b4b Fixes: CID#198454 Dereference before null check
2019-05-10ran_a_make_handover_request(): allow no encryptionNeels Hofmeyr1-1/+2
Fixes: coverity CID 198454 Change-Id: Ifb83ab2a8b6148b457224687ffada2dff4c3204f
2019-05-08large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC HandoverNeels Hofmeyr1-0/+1284
3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd