aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNeels Hofmeyr <nhofmeyr@sysmocom.de>2022-09-12 03:41:05 +0200
committerNeels Hofmeyr <nhofmeyr@sysmocom.de>2022-09-23 19:11:51 +0200
commitb3be16e152676ca57bdadff56dc42bb54867f4cd (patch)
tree06fd428d4fd84e34c3bd003ccf318d30d6c1734e
parent1b4667820e4fce1556730697e9455e5f793801a6 (diff)
codec t9n: comment
-rw-r--r--src/libmsc/codec_sdp_cc_t9n.c4
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/libmsc/codec_sdp_cc_t9n.c b/src/libmsc/codec_sdp_cc_t9n.c
index 200bd8584..790202c0e 100644
--- a/src/libmsc/codec_sdp_cc_t9n.c
+++ b/src/libmsc/codec_sdp_cc_t9n.c
@@ -121,6 +121,10 @@ const struct codec_mapping codec_map[] = {
* to match this entry, and it ends in an aborted call due to no codec match.
* If the peer offers plain "AMR/8000" and we reply with "AMR/8000 fmtp:octet-align=1",
* then everything works out happily, */
+ /* XXX what?? 3GPP TS 26.103 says "The bandwidth efficient mode of RFC 4867 shall be used. To
+ * offer the bandwidth-efficient mode, the octet-align parameter should be omitted in SDP."
+ * How can it work when we send bw-efficient AMR but said octet-aligned in the SDP??
+ */
.fmtp = "octet-align=1",
},
.mgcp = CODEC_AMR_8000_1,