From 945c09381d033d142d8e851cd7a4de2e407b61ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Philipp Maier Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 13:34:34 +0100 Subject: oml: use oml_tx_failure_event_rep() instead of signals to SS_FAIL At some locations in the code a signal to SS_FAIL is dispatched in order to trigger the sending of an OML failure event report in oml.c. This is a bit overcomplicated for the task. Lets use oml_tx_failure_event_rep() to send the failure event reports and lets remove the signal handler for SS_FAIL. Change-Id: Ie4fce1273a19cc14f37ff6fc7582b2945c7e7c47 Related: OS#3843 --- include/osmo-bts/signal.h | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'include/osmo-bts') diff --git a/include/osmo-bts/signal.h b/include/osmo-bts/signal.h index 01d4099b..c8168a26 100644 --- a/include/osmo-bts/signal.h +++ b/include/osmo-bts/signal.h @@ -5,7 +5,6 @@ enum sig_subsys { SS_GLOBAL, - SS_FAIL, }; enum signals_global { -- cgit v1.2.3