From 64b092e8551f942f06e831f989c8af4e03913428 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Neels Hofmeyr Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 23:42:56 +0100 Subject: lchan: rf release: make sure conn is NULL lchan_fsm_wait_rf_release_ack_onenter() calls gscon_forget_lchan(). At the point where the conn has no lchan, the lchan must not have a conn. Make sure that conn is NULL after gscon_forget_lchan(). I hope this fixes OS#3686, it is the only situation I could find where the disassociation is potentially one-sided. I get the feeling that this should be hardcoded in gscon_forget_lchan(), but I dimly remember other situations that are less trivial, where it doesn't necessarily make sense to forget reciprocically. So only fixing this one now. Related: OS#3686 Change-Id: If0c6e495e419b9dbb44443c3fc3f54dd4b714aa5 --- src/osmo-bsc/lchan_fsm.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/osmo-bsc/lchan_fsm.c b/src/osmo-bsc/lchan_fsm.c index 0046f5924..d95620fe0 100644 --- a/src/osmo-bsc/lchan_fsm.c +++ b/src/osmo-bsc/lchan_fsm.c @@ -1005,8 +1005,10 @@ static void lchan_fsm_wait_rf_release_ack_onenter(struct osmo_fsm_inst *fi, uint /* For planned releases, a conn has already forgotten about the lchan. And later on, in * lchan_reset(), we make sure it does. But in case of releases from error handling, the * conn might as well notice now already that its lchan is becoming unusable. */ - if (lchan->conn) + if (lchan->conn) { gscon_forget_lchan(lchan->conn, lchan); + lchan_forget_conn(lchan); + } rc = rsl_tx_rf_chan_release(lchan); if (rc) -- cgit v1.2.3