aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/osmo-bsc/rest_octets.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-04-14vty: clarify EGPRS Packet Channel Request message supportVadim Yanitskiy1-7/+2
According to 3GPP TS 44.060, section 12.24, GPRS Cell Options IE contains two parameters related to 11 bit Access Burst support: - ACCESS_BURST_TYPE - whether the 8 or 11 bit format shall be used in the PACKET CHANNEL REQUEST message, the PTCCH/U block, PACKET CONTROL ACKNOWLEDGMENT and the PS HANDOVER ACCESS messages on the PRACH (if present). - EGPRS_PACKET_CHANNEL_REQUEST - whether EGPRS capable MSs shall use EGPRS PACKET CHANNEL REQUEST message for Uplink TBF establishment on the RACH or on the PRACH (if present). The VTY option 'gprs 11bit_rach_support_for_egprs' actually controls the second parameter - EGPRS_PACKET_CHANNEL_REQUEST, though it may be hard to understand this from its name and description. This patch is actually a group of tightly related changes: - deprecate 'gprs 11bit_rach_support_for_egprs (0|1)': - update its description to avoid any possible confusion, - print a warning if it's used in non-EGPRS mode, - print a warning if it's still used; - introduce '[no] gprs egprs-packet-channel-request': - ensure that it can only set / printed in the EGPRS mode; - take a chance to clean-up / rename the related struct members: - 'supports_egprs_11bit_rach' -> bool 'egprs_pkt_chan_request', - remove 'supports_egprs_11bit_rach' from 'gprs_cell_options' because we already have 'ext_info.use_egprs_p_ch_req' there. Change-Id: Ied5bd10a806aeeac65ef32339d4ab0e3700e5da9
2019-07-26rest_octets: add Serving Cell Priority ParametersPhilipp Maier1-2/+19
When we add an EARFCN to to the SI2quater struct we do not add Serving Cell Priority Parameters. This essentially causes to MS to ignore the EARFCN because it is still undefined under which conditions the MS should change to LTE. Related: SYS#4510 Change-Id: I7eaf7de4386fe8aea404e8a187d8a1f5ed596ead
2018-06-07dissolve libbsc: move all to src/osmo-bsc, link .o filesNeels Hofmeyr1-0/+878
Move all of libbsc/ into osmo-bsc/, and separate/move some implementations to allow linking from utils/* and ipaccess/* without pulling in unccessary dependencies. Some utilities use gsm_network and gsm_bts structs, which already include data structures for fairly advanced uses. Move initialization that only osmo-bsc needs into new bsc_network_init() and bsc_bts_alloc_register() functions, so that the leaner tools can use the old gsm_* versions without the need to link everything (e.g. handover and lchan alloc code). In some instances, there need to be stubs if to cut off linking "just before the RSL level" and prevent dependencies from creeping in. - abis_rsl_rcvmsg(): the only program currently interpreting RSL messages is osmo-bsc, the utils are merely concerned with OML, if at all. - paging_flush_bts(): ip.access nanobts models call this when the RSL link is dropped. Only osmo-bsc actually needs to do anything there. - on_gsm_ts_init(): the mechanism to trigger timeslot initialization is related to OML, while this action to take on init would pull in RSL dependencies. utils/ and ipaccess/ each have a stubs.c file to implement these stubs. Tests implement stubs inline where required. From src/utils/, src/ipaccess/ and tests/*/, link in .o files from osmo-bsc/. In order for this to work, the osmo-bsc subdir must be built before the other source trees. (An alternative would be to include the .c files as sources, but that would re-compile them in every source tree. Not a large burden really, but unless linking .o files gives problems, let's have the quicker build.) Minor obvious cleanups creep in with this patch, I will not bother to name them individually now unless code review asks me to. Rationale: 1) libbsc has been separate to use it for osmo-nitb and osmo-bsc in the old openbsc.git. This is no longer required, and spreading over libbsc and osmo-bsc is distracting. 2) Recently, ridiculous linking requirements have made adding new functions cumbersome, because libbsc has started depending on osmo-bsc/*.c implementations: on gscon FSM and bssap functions. For example, neither bs11_config nor ipaccess-config nor bts_test need handover_cfg or BSSMAP message composition. It makes no sense to link the entire osmo-bsc to it, nor do we want to keep adding stubs to each linking realm. Change-Id: I36a586726f5818121abe54d25654819fc451d3bf