diff options
| author | Neels Hofmeyr <neels@hofmeyr.de> | 2021-07-11 22:15:13 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | laforge <laforge@osmocom.org> | 2021-07-16 16:04:18 +0000 |
| commit | ea0b6b2ca9c6491f99d047ade2596ce28340e351 (patch) | |
| tree | afcc9e6f06d85e628b5b5e55f24050b023cb5c43 /tests | |
| parent | 9c61446423d6aea9391ff7de54ea69ecba5a21ad (diff) | |
add test_dyn_ts_favor_static_ts_as_target.ho_vty
In a discussion about the effect of interference levels, I noticed that
there is not sufficient clarity about how strongly the preference of
static timeslots is ranked. This test helps to show what we have.
Related: SYS#5313
Change-Id: I0911cd74613045d9fbe29d04eaef036d32049b92
Diffstat (limited to 'tests')
| -rw-r--r-- | tests/handover/handover_tests.ok | 1 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tests/handover/test_dyn_ts_favor_static_ts_as_target.ho_vty | 38 |
2 files changed, 39 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tests/handover/handover_tests.ok b/tests/handover/handover_tests.ok index a03454d43..168ebd672 100644 --- a/tests/handover/handover_tests.ok +++ b/tests/handover/handover_tests.ok @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ pass test_dyn_ts_congestion_tch_f_vs_tch_h.ho_vty pass test_dyn_ts_congestion_tch_f_vs_tch_h_2.ho_vty pass test_dyn_ts_favor_half_used_tch_h_as_target.ho_vty pass test_dyn_ts_favor_moving_half_used_tch_h.ho_vty +pass test_dyn_ts_favor_static_ts_as_target.ho_vty pass test_ho_to_better_cell.ho_vty pass test_ho_to_better_cell_2.ho_vty pass test_hysteresis.ho_vty diff --git a/tests/handover/test_dyn_ts_favor_static_ts_as_target.ho_vty b/tests/handover/test_dyn_ts_favor_static_ts_as_target.ho_vty new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c50b00705 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/handover/test_dyn_ts_favor_static_ts_as_target.ho_vty @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +# If both a static and a dynamic TCH/H (even without pchan switch!) are available, we always prefer static TS. +create-bts trx-count 1 timeslots c+s4 dyn TCH/H dyn TCH/H dyn TCH/H PDCH + +network + bts 0 + channel allocator ascending + +set-ts-use trx 0 0 states * TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H * + +# the dynamic timeslot is already in TCH/H mode, and needs no pchan switch. It appears first in the list, hence it would +# be used first -- but we prefer using static TS when still available: +create-ms bts 0 TCH/H AMR +expect-ts-use trx 0 0 states * TCH/-H TCH/HH TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H * +# ^ + +# Interference ratings do NOT influence whether a static or dynamic lchan (even without pchan switch) is going to be +# assigned. +network + bts 0 + channel allocator avoid-interference 1 + interference-meas level-bounds -115 -109 -103 -97 -91 -85 +# 0 1 2 3 4 5 + +# Here the dyn TS lchan happens to have less interference. But still the choice to prefer static over dynamic weighs +# stronger. The static TS with least interference is picked. +# dyn TCH/H dyn TCH/H dyn TCH/H +expect-ts-use trx 0 0 states * TCH/-H TCH/HH TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H * +res-ind trx 0 0 levels - 4- -- 1- 4- 3- 2- - +create-ms bts 0 TCH/H AMR +expect-ts-use trx 0 0 states * TCH/-H TCH/HH TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/HH * +# ^ +create-ms bts 0 TCH/H AMR +expect-ts-use trx 0 0 states * TCH/-H TCH/HH TCH/-H TCH/HH TCH/-H TCH/HH * +# ^ +# now only dynamic TS are left. The one dyn lchan with least interference is picked +create-ms bts 0 TCH/H AMR +expect-ts-use trx 0 0 states * TCH/-H TCH/HH TCH/HH TCH/HH TCH/-H TCH/HH * +# ^ |