diff options
author | Neels Hofmeyr <neels@hofmeyr.de> | 2018-11-06 22:24:07 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Neels Hofmeyr <nhofmeyr@sysmocom.de> | 2018-11-14 16:16:30 +0000 |
commit | 5b1a7d1e9b8b21b4d4fa74cb5e7ffea14fa5fdb2 (patch) | |
tree | ec73d9f7fd59ad594573e9def7e8a7b5c7687bcf /src | |
parent | d30922f7a384947f6766523180cad7b108c9d751 (diff) |
lchan release: always Deact SACCH
If an lchan is being released and had a SACCH active, there is no reason to
omit the Deact SACCH message ever. All of the callers that passed
do_deact_sacch = false did so for no good reason.
Drop the do_deact_sacch flag everywhere and, when the lchan type matches and
SAPI[0] is still active, simply always send a Deact SACCH message.
The do_deact_sacch flag was carried over from legacy code, by me, mainly
because I never really understood why it was there. I do hope I'm correct now,
asserting that having this flag makes no sense.
Change-Id: Id3301df059582da2377ef82feae554e94fa42035
Diffstat (limited to 'src')
-rw-r--r-- | src/osmo-bsc/abis_rsl.c | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/osmo-bsc/assignment_fsm.c | 4 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/osmo-bsc/bsc_subscr_conn_fsm.c | 16 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/osmo-bsc/bsc_vty.c | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/osmo-bsc/gsm_04_08_rr.c | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/osmo-bsc/gsm_08_08.c | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/osmo-bsc/handover_fsm.c | 6 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/osmo-bsc/lchan_fsm.c | 21 |
8 files changed, 27 insertions, 28 deletions
diff --git a/src/osmo-bsc/abis_rsl.c b/src/osmo-bsc/abis_rsl.c index 0ec8fbc44..c16f0446e 100644 --- a/src/osmo-bsc/abis_rsl.c +++ b/src/osmo-bsc/abis_rsl.c @@ -896,7 +896,7 @@ static int rsl_rx_conn_fail(struct msgb *msg) * the connection will presumably be torn down and lead to an lchan release. During initial * Channel Request from the MS, an lchan has no conn yet, so in that case release now. */ if (!lchan->conn) { - lchan_release(lchan, false, false, true, *cause_p); + lchan_release(lchan, false, true, *cause_p); } else osmo_fsm_inst_dispatch(lchan->conn->fi, GSCON_EV_RSL_CONN_FAIL, (void*)cause_p); diff --git a/src/osmo-bsc/assignment_fsm.c b/src/osmo-bsc/assignment_fsm.c index 653681ed0..93362f85b 100644 --- a/src/osmo-bsc/assignment_fsm.c +++ b/src/osmo-bsc/assignment_fsm.c @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ void assignment_reset(struct gsm_subscriber_connection *conn) if (conn->assignment.new_lchan) { struct gsm_lchan *lchan = conn->assignment.new_lchan; conn->assignment.new_lchan = NULL; - lchan_release(lchan, false, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL); + lchan_release(lchan, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL); } if (conn->assignment.created_ci_for_msc) { @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static void assignment_success(struct gsm_subscriber_connection *conn) if (!conn->assignment.fi) { /* The lchan was ready, and we failed to tell the MSC about it. By releasing this lchan, * the conn will notice that its primary lchan is gone and should clean itself up. */ - lchan_release(conn->lchan, false, true, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL); + lchan_release(conn->lchan, true, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL); return; } diff --git a/src/osmo-bsc/bsc_subscr_conn_fsm.c b/src/osmo-bsc/bsc_subscr_conn_fsm.c index 5856d7abd..ec06e9bce 100644 --- a/src/osmo-bsc/bsc_subscr_conn_fsm.c +++ b/src/osmo-bsc/bsc_subscr_conn_fsm.c @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static void forward_dtap(struct gsm_subscriber_connection *conn, struct msgb *ms /* Release an lchan in such a way that it doesn't fire events back to the conn. */ static void gscon_release_lchan(struct gsm_subscriber_connection *conn, struct gsm_lchan *lchan, - bool do_sacch_deact, bool do_rr_release, bool err, enum gsm48_rr_cause cause_rr) + bool do_rr_release, bool err, enum gsm48_rr_cause cause_rr) { if (!lchan || !conn) return; @@ -164,17 +164,17 @@ static void gscon_release_lchan(struct gsm_subscriber_connection *conn, struct g conn->ho.new_lchan = NULL; if (conn->assignment.new_lchan == lchan) conn->assignment.new_lchan = NULL; - lchan_release(lchan, do_sacch_deact, do_rr_release, err, cause_rr); + lchan_release(lchan, do_rr_release, err, cause_rr); } -void gscon_release_lchans(struct gsm_subscriber_connection *conn, bool do_sacch_deact, bool do_rr_release) +void gscon_release_lchans(struct gsm_subscriber_connection *conn, bool do_rr_release) { if (conn->ho.fi) handover_end(conn, HO_RESULT_CONN_RELEASE); assignment_reset(conn); - gscon_release_lchan(conn, conn->lchan, do_sacch_deact, do_rr_release, false, 0); + gscon_release_lchan(conn, conn->lchan, do_rr_release, false, 0); } static void handle_bssap_n_connect(struct osmo_fsm_inst *fi, struct osmo_scu_prim *scu_prim) @@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ void gscon_change_primary_lchan(struct gsm_subscriber_connection *conn, struct g osmo_fsm_inst_dispatch(conn->lchan->fi_rtp, LCHAN_RTP_EV_ESTABLISHED, 0); if (old_lchan && (old_lchan != new_lchan)) - gscon_release_lchan(conn, old_lchan, false, false, false, 0); + gscon_release_lchan(conn, old_lchan, false, false, 0); } void gscon_lchan_releasing(struct gsm_subscriber_connection *conn, struct gsm_lchan *lchan) @@ -716,7 +716,7 @@ static void gscon_fsm_allstate(struct osmo_fsm_inst *fi, uint32_t event, void *d if (conn->fi->state != ST_CLEARING) osmo_fsm_inst_state_chg(fi, ST_CLEARING, 60, 999); LOGPFSML(fi, LOGL_DEBUG, "Releasing all lchans (if any) after BSSMAP Clear Command\n"); - gscon_release_lchans(conn, true, true); + gscon_release_lchans(conn, true); /* FIXME: Release all terestrial resources in ST_CLEARING */ /* According to 3GPP 48.008 3.1.9.1. "The BSS need not wait for the radio channel * release to be completed or for the guard timer to expire before returning the @@ -792,7 +792,7 @@ static void gscon_pre_term(struct osmo_fsm_inst *fi, enum osmo_fsm_term_cause ca } LOGPFSML(fi, LOGL_DEBUG, "Releasing all lchans (if any) because this conn is terminating\n"); - gscon_release_lchans(conn, false, true); + gscon_release_lchans(conn, true); /* drop pending messages */ gscon_dtap_queue_flush(conn, 0); @@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ static int gscon_timer_cb(struct osmo_fsm_inst *fi) switch (fi->T) { case 993210: - gscon_release_lchan(conn, conn->lchan, false, true, true, RSL_ERR_INTERWORKING); + gscon_release_lchan(conn, conn->lchan, true, true, RSL_ERR_INTERWORKING); /* MSC has not responded/confirmed connection with CC, this * could indicate a bad SCCP connection. We now inform the the diff --git a/src/osmo-bsc/bsc_vty.c b/src/osmo-bsc/bsc_vty.c index 9f42d8a74..8eb069293 100644 --- a/src/osmo-bsc/bsc_vty.c +++ b/src/osmo-bsc/bsc_vty.c @@ -4588,7 +4588,7 @@ DEFUN(lchan_act, lchan_act_cmd, } vty_out(vty, "%% Asking for release of %s in state %s%s", gsm_lchan_name(lchan), osmo_fsm_inst_state_name(lchan->fi), VTY_NEWLINE); - lchan_release(lchan, false, !!(lchan->conn), false, 0); + lchan_release(lchan, !!(lchan->conn), false, 0); } return CMD_SUCCESS; diff --git a/src/osmo-bsc/gsm_04_08_rr.c b/src/osmo-bsc/gsm_04_08_rr.c index c3dd3075d..4659c1ac9 100644 --- a/src/osmo-bsc/gsm_04_08_rr.c +++ b/src/osmo-bsc/gsm_04_08_rr.c @@ -942,7 +942,7 @@ int gsm0408_rcvmsg(struct msgb *msg, uint8_t link_id) /* allocate a new connection */ lchan->conn = bsc_subscr_con_allocate(msg->lchan->ts->trx->bts->network); if (!lchan->conn) { - lchan_release(lchan, false, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL); + lchan_release(lchan, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL); return -1; } lchan->conn->lchan = lchan; diff --git a/src/osmo-bsc/gsm_08_08.c b/src/osmo-bsc/gsm_08_08.c index 48e87fcb8..062c878d3 100644 --- a/src/osmo-bsc/gsm_08_08.c +++ b/src/osmo-bsc/gsm_08_08.c @@ -525,7 +525,7 @@ static int move_to_msc(struct gsm_subscriber_connection *_conn, /* FIXME: I have not the slightest idea what move_to_msc() intends to do; during lchan * FSM introduction, I changed this and hope it is the appropriate action. I actually * assume this is unused legacy code for osmo-bsc_nat?? */ - gscon_release_lchans(_conn, false, false); + gscon_release_lchans(_conn, false); return 1; } diff --git a/src/osmo-bsc/handover_fsm.c b/src/osmo-bsc/handover_fsm.c index 8076eebfe..f2836cf37 100644 --- a/src/osmo-bsc/handover_fsm.c +++ b/src/osmo-bsc/handover_fsm.c @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ static void handover_reset(struct gsm_subscriber_connection *conn) struct mgwep_ci *ci; if (conn->ho.new_lchan) /* New lchan was activated but never passed to a conn */ - lchan_release(conn->ho.new_lchan, true, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL); + lchan_release(conn->ho.new_lchan, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL); ci = conn->ho.created_ci_for_msc; if (ci) { @@ -725,7 +725,7 @@ void handover_end(struct gsm_subscriber_connection *conn, enum handover_result r /* 3GPP TS 48.008 3.1.5.3.3 "Abnormal Conditions": if neither MS reports * HO Failure nor the MSC sends a Clear Command, we should release the * dedicated radio resources and send a Clear Request to the MSC. */ - lchan_release(conn->lchan, false, true, true, GSM48_RR_CAUSE_ABNORMAL_TIMER); + lchan_release(conn->lchan, true, true, GSM48_RR_CAUSE_ABNORMAL_TIMER); /* Once the channel release is through, the BSSMAP Clear will follow. */ break; } @@ -756,7 +756,7 @@ void handover_end(struct gsm_subscriber_connection *conn, enum handover_result r /* Detach the new_lchan last, so we can still see it in above logging */ if (ho->new_lchan) { /* Release new lchan, it didn't work out */ - lchan_release(ho->new_lchan, false, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL); + lchan_release(ho->new_lchan, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL); ho->new_lchan = NULL; } diff --git a/src/osmo-bsc/lchan_fsm.c b/src/osmo-bsc/lchan_fsm.c index f43264410..5428d973e 100644 --- a/src/osmo-bsc/lchan_fsm.c +++ b/src/osmo-bsc/lchan_fsm.c @@ -156,14 +156,14 @@ static void lchan_on_fully_established(struct gsm_lchan *lchan) LOG_LCHAN(lchan, LOGL_ERROR, "lchan activation for assignment succeeded, but lchan has no conn:" " cannot trigger appropriate actions. Release.\n"); - lchan_release(lchan, false, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL); + lchan_release(lchan, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL); break; } if (!lchan->conn->assignment.fi) { LOG_LCHAN(lchan, LOGL_ERROR, "lchan activation for assignment succeeded, but lchan has no" " assignment ongoing: cannot trigger appropriate actions. Release.\n"); - lchan_release(lchan, false, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL); + lchan_release(lchan, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL); break; } osmo_fsm_inst_dispatch(lchan->conn->assignment.fi, ASSIGNMENT_EV_LCHAN_ESTABLISHED, @@ -177,14 +177,14 @@ static void lchan_on_fully_established(struct gsm_lchan *lchan) if (!lchan->conn) { LOG_LCHAN(lchan, LOGL_ERROR, "lchan activation for handover succeeded, but lchan has no conn\n"); - lchan_release(lchan, false, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL); + lchan_release(lchan, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL); break; } if (!lchan->conn->ho.fi) { LOG_LCHAN(lchan, LOGL_ERROR, "lchan activation for handover succeeded, but lchan has no" " handover ongoing\n"); - lchan_release(lchan, false, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL); + lchan_release(lchan, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL); break; } osmo_fsm_inst_dispatch(lchan->conn->ho.fi, HO_EV_LCHAN_ESTABLISHED, lchan); @@ -720,14 +720,14 @@ static void lchan_fsm_post_activ_ack(struct osmo_fsm_inst *fi) LOG_LCHAN(lchan, LOGL_ERROR, "lchan activation for assignment succeeded, but lchan has no conn:" " cannot trigger appropriate actions. Release.\n"); - lchan_release(lchan, false, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL); + lchan_release(lchan, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL); break; } if (!lchan->conn->assignment.fi) { LOG_LCHAN(lchan, LOGL_ERROR, "lchan activation for assignment succeeded, but lchan has no" " assignment ongoing: cannot trigger appropriate actions. Release.\n"); - lchan_release(lchan, false, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL); + lchan_release(lchan, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL); break; } /* After the Chan Activ Ack, the MS expects to receive an RR Assignment Command. @@ -740,14 +740,14 @@ static void lchan_fsm_post_activ_ack(struct osmo_fsm_inst *fi) LOG_LCHAN(lchan, LOGL_ERROR, "lchan activation for handover succeeded, but lchan has no conn:" " cannot trigger appropriate actions. Release.\n"); - lchan_release(lchan, false, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL); + lchan_release(lchan, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL); break; } if (!lchan->conn->ho.fi) { LOG_LCHAN(lchan, LOGL_ERROR, "lchan activation for handover succeeded, but lchan has no" " handover ongoing: cannot trigger appropriate actions. Release.\n"); - lchan_release(lchan, false, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL); + lchan_release(lchan, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL); break; } /* After the Chan Activ Ack of the new lchan, send the MS an RR Handover Command on the @@ -935,7 +935,7 @@ static void lchan_do_release(struct gsm_lchan *lchan) if (lchan->fi_rtp) osmo_fsm_inst_dispatch(lchan->fi_rtp, LCHAN_RTP_EV_RELEASE, 0); - if (lchan->deact_sacch && should_sacch_deact(lchan)) + if (should_sacch_deact(lchan)) rsl_deact_sacch(lchan); } @@ -1296,7 +1296,7 @@ int lchan_fsm_timer_cb(struct osmo_fsm_inst *fi) } } -void lchan_release(struct gsm_lchan *lchan, bool sacch_deact, bool do_rr_release, +void lchan_release(struct gsm_lchan *lchan, bool do_rr_release, bool err, enum gsm48_rr_cause cause_rr) { if (!lchan || !lchan->fi) @@ -1309,7 +1309,6 @@ void lchan_release(struct gsm_lchan *lchan, bool sacch_deact, bool do_rr_release struct osmo_fsm_inst *fi = lchan->fi; lchan->release_in_error = err; lchan->rsl_error_cause = cause_rr; - lchan->deact_sacch = sacch_deact; lchan->do_rr_release = do_rr_release; /* States waiting for events will notice the desire to release when done waiting, so it is enough |