| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
The first fields are still the location up to the height.
The next field is "operational" if any of the trx are operational,
otherwise "inoperational"
The second to last field contains "locked" if all of the trx are in the
admin state, otherwise "unlocked".
The last field represents the rf policy currently in effect. It is one
of (on|off|grace|unknown).
<tstamp>,<valid>,<lat>,<lon>,<height>,<oper>,<admin>,<policy>
|
|
bts_hsl_femtocell.c: In function ‘hsl_sign_link_up’:
bts_hsl_femtocell.c:206:3: warning: format ‘%lx’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 7 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Wformat]
bts_hsl_femtocell.c:210:2: warning: format ‘%lx’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 6 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Wformat]
|
|
bsc_init.c:203:6: warning: ‘rc’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
bsc_init.c:101:6: note: ‘rc’ was declared here
|
|
abis_nm.c: In function ‘abis_nm_get_attr’:
abis_nm.c:1380:11: warning: unused variable ‘cur’ [-Wunused-variable]
abis_nm.c: In function ‘ipac_parse_bcch_info’:
abis_nm.c:2588:11: warning: variable ‘len’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
bts_nokia_site.c:1310:6: warning: variable ‘constructed’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
bts_nokia_site.c: At top level:
bts_nokia_site.c:1364:12: warning: ‘dump_elements’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
gsm_04_08.c: In function ‘mm_rx_loc_upd_req’:
gsm_04_08.c:521:6: warning: variable ‘rc’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
osmo_msc.c: In function ‘msc_ciph_m_compl’:
osmo_msc.c:122:7: warning: variable ‘rc’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
bts_hsl_femtocell.c: In function ‘hslfemto_bootstrap_om’:
bts_hsl_femtocell.c:101:11: warning: variable ‘cur’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
bts_hsl_femtocell.c: In function ‘hsl_drop_oml’:
bts_hsl_femtocell.c:232:21: warning: variable ‘line’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
handover_logic.c: In function ‘ho_chan_activ_ack’:
handover_logic.c:197:6: warning: variable ‘rc’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Messages to CF and other core objects need to go to the BTS (IXU/DXU)
OML link, not to the OML link of the primary TRX!
|
|
This case happens if the BTS signals operational state for a TRXC which
is not configured as TRX in the openbsc.cfg
|
|
We now have a lchan->csd_mode member that determines if RSL should
activate the channel in CSD transparent services or not. The previous
code always assumed CSD is non-transparent.
(This requires libosmocore >= eed26116c96f03c6128fac3dead9054714af6cab)
|
|
|
|
A function called this way should return 1 if it is compatible, so
something like "if (!chan_compat_with_mode())" will check if it is not
compatible.
|
|
Some nodes below 'config' didn't have ournode_exit / ournode_end,
and thus were not able to properly perform this function. exit should
always only go back one level, while end drops us back to ENABLE_NODE.
The prompt now represents the nesting level, and there's one consistent
space after the final prompt character (typically #).
|
|
|
|
This effectively limits the number of BTSs to 256, but I think that's
acceptable for now. Unfortuantely there's no decent way to dynamically
update the valid number range depending on how many BTSs are actually
configured in the system :/
|
|
this uses vty_cmd_string_from_valstr() from _very_ recent libosmocore,
so you have to update the library, sorry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While generally we should log troly unknown RR messages, we can simply
pass along RRLP messages (which aren't unknown!)
In real networks, the RRLP would probably not end up at the MSC, but
well, sometimes we don't care what real/classic networks do.
|
|
Group all three structure members involved in bts-specific timezone
handling into a sub-structure.
|
|
... it might well a completely non-ho-related establishment
|
|
We are currently not checking if the BTS actually suports that cipher,
and we particularly don't have any hack for ip.access which apparently
seems to re-use the RSL algorithm identifier for A5/2.
|
|
so far, osmo-bts/sysmobts used to be entered as "sysmobts" type in the
configuration file. However, there are some differences in the
protocol/behaviour and we should reflect that by a new BTS plugin (with
lots of code reuse from the nanobts driver).
|
|
... otherwise it's impossible to distinguish them from each other.
|
|
|
|
This also removes the dependency to osmo_sock() inside libcommon and
replaces it with osmo_sock_* from libosmocore
|
|
This timer will only be forwarded to BS11 and Ericsson Abis so far,
not to Nokia and ip.access BTS yet.
|
|
Thanks to Andreas Eversberg for spotting this one.
|
|
|
|
The nitb will provide the RF interface as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Call the channel by the right name.
|
|
In case the connection should not be created/accepted release
the channel by sending a RR Release and de-activating the
SACCH. Phones should deal better with that behavior.
|
|
In case the call handling starts on a TCH/H switch to a TCH/F
if fullrate is requested. Add a method that is used to determine
if the mode and current channel are compatible with each other.
|
|
We want to have multiple MSCs but we also have some data
that is only present on a per BSC basis. Right now the
MSC data is not allocated with talloc, so we have some
change in the talloc contexts.
|
|
In addition to SI 2 and SI 5, the SI 2ter and 2bis is generated, if
neighbour cells in other bands exist. Also it is indicated in the rest
octets of SI3, that SI 2ter is used. If no neighbour cell in a different
band exists, the SI 2ter and SI 5ter is omitted.
A special case is P-GSM range (channels 1-124). To be compatible with
older phones, SI 2bis and SI 5bis is used. If the BCCH lays inside the
P-GSM band, only neighbour cells of the P-GSM range are included in
SI 2 and SI 5. If neighbour cells exist in the same band (900), but lay
outside the P-GSM range, the SI 2bis and SI 5bis is used to extend the
list of neighbour cells. The extension is also indicated in SI 2 and
SI 5. If the BCCH lays inside the P-GSM range, but no neighbour cell
exists in the same band outside the P-GSM range, the SI 2bis ans SI 5bis
are omitted.
|
|
|
|
This must have been obsoleted by the move to libosmo-abis.
GCC warning:
bts_ipaccess_nanobts.c: In function ‘ipaccess_drop_oml’:
bts_ipaccess_nanobts.c:509:21: warning: variable ‘line’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
|
|
The old BSC code had code to override the payload type, this has
been removed, remove the variable accessing it.
GCC warning:
abis_rsl.c: In function ‘ipa_rtp_pt_for_lchan’:
abis_rsl.c:1590:22: warning: unused variable ‘net’ [-Wunused-variable]
|
|
Introduce a SS_CCCH for the paging and the rach load. The paging
code could now start using the signal.
GCC warning:
abis_rsl.c: In function ‘rsl_rx_ccch_load’:
abis_rsl.c:1371:11: warning: variable ‘rach_access_count’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
abis_rsl.c:1370:11: warning: variable ‘rach_busy_count’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
abis_rsl.c:1369:11: warning: variable ‘rach_slot_count’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
|
|
GCC warning:
abis_rsl.c: In function ‘rsl_rx_chan_rqd’:
abis_rsl.c:1245:10: warning: variable ‘ts_number’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
|
|
GCC warning:
abis_om2000.c: In function ‘abis_om2k_sendmsg’:
abis_om2000.c:804:6: warning: unused variable ‘to_trx_oml’ [-Wunused-variable]
|
|
attribute get|set <0-255> (.HEX) was never implemented and the
output about the unused attributes clutter the build output, remove
them.
GCC warning:
abis_nm_vty.c: In function ‘oml_attrib_get’:
abis_nm_vty.c:141:25: warning: unused variable ‘oms’ [-Wunused-variable]
abis_nm_vty.c: In function ‘oml_attrib_set’:
abis_nm_vty.c:152:25: warning: unused variable ‘oms’ [-Wunused-variable]
|
|
Use LOGP(DNM, LOGL_ERROR, ...); for errors in the
abis_nm_rx_sw_act_req method.
GCC warning:
abis_nm.c: In function ‘abis_nm_rx_sw_act_req’:
abis_nm.c:412:6: warning: variable ‘ret’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
|
|
I'm sure I read somewhere that it actually was 0..1024, as I kept
wondering how stupid it was to use 10bit+1. However, that source
was incorrect, as GSM TS 05.05 quite clearly states 0..1023
|
