| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
In a future commit, gsm_subscriber will be replaced by vlr_subscr, and it will
not make sense to use vlr_subscr in libbsc. Thus we need a dedicated BSC
subscriber: struct bsc_subscr.
Add rf_policy arg to bsc_grace_paging_request() because the bsc_subscr will no
longer have a backpointer to gsm_network (used to be via subscr->group).
Create a separate logging filter for the new BSC subscriber. The implementation
of adjusting the filter context is added in libbsc to not introduce
bsc_subscr_get/_put() dependencies to libcommon.
During Paging Response, fetch a bsc_subscr from the mobile identity, like we do
for the gsm_subscriber. It looks like a duplication now, but will make sense
for the VLR as well as for future MSC split patches.
Naming: it was requested to not name the new struct bsc_sub, because 'sub' is
too ambiguous. At the same time it would be fine to have 'bsc_sub_' as function
prefix. Instead of struct bsc_subscriber and bsc_sub_ prefix, I decided to
match both up as struct bsc_subscr and bsc_subscr_ function prefix. It's fast
to type, relatively short, unambiguous, and the naming is consistent.
Add bsc_subscr unit test.
Related: OS#1592, OS#1594
Change-Id: Ia61cc00e8bb186b976939a4fc8f7cf9ce6aa3d8e
|
|
With the OsmoMSC program coming up, the name osmo_msc_data becomes even
more confusing than it already is. Clearly indicate it as libbsc's data of
a remote MSC by prefixing with bsc_.
Also, the Osmocom community has in the meantime agreed to have the osmo_
prefix only in libosmocore, to avoid naming conflicts in case things are
moved there. So while renaming anyway, also drop the osmo_ prefix.
Change-Id: I0dfbcb7d1a579211180f71319982820d8700afab
|
|
Change-Id: I2f22be93d1a5fd6f229b85305a1d2a2cf6a43ce2
|
|
The RF lock excluded BTS was not paged at all. Now forward the
paging message to the handler and call a function that will check
if this LAC can be paged right now. Introduce a new paging method
that allows to page on a dedicated bts, refactor the code to use
this method for paging.
|
|
When introducing the exclude for the BTS lock the RF stayed up but
all connections were immediately released. Optionally pass the BTS
as second parameter and check the exclude bit.
Tested-with: rf-lock-exclude/RFLockExcludeTest.st
|
|
The reason for this is quite simple: We want to make sure anyone
running a customized version of OpenBSC to operate a network will
have to release all custom modifiations to the source code.
|
|
The grace code will decide if a given connection is allowed to
be made or if it is going to be rejected. For active connections
it is going to send a USSD message.
|
