Workaround for what is probably a glibc bug (but we'll see this crop up again

and again, if we don't add the workaround).
Reported by: rolek
Patch by: tilghman
(Closes issue #11601, closes issue #11426)


git-svn-id: http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4@94808 f38db490-d61c-443f-a65b-d21fe96a405b

1 files changed, 8 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/main/manager.c b/main/manager.c
index 830634792..6d7cc3fc1 100644
--- a/main/manager.c
+++ b/main/manager.c
@@ -2283,6 +2283,14 @@ static void *session_do(void *data)
 		}
 		ast_log(LOG_EVENT, "Failed attempt from %s\n", ast_inet_ntoa(s->sin.sin_addr));
 	}
+
+	/* If the entire session occurs in a single context switch, then it's
+	 * possible to get an unsafe memory condition by free()ing the memory
+	 * before letting other threads run at least once.  This actually seems
+	 * like a workaround for a glibc bug.
+	 */
+	usleep(1);
+
 	destroy_session(s);
 	return NULL;
 }