aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/channels
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authormmichelson <mmichelson@f38db490-d61c-443f-a65b-d21fe96a405b>2009-04-09 18:51:20 +0000
committermmichelson <mmichelson@f38db490-d61c-443f-a65b-d21fe96a405b>2009-04-09 18:51:20 +0000
commit4c1a9e8396d1ee084ab606b733e4e0db695a88d5 (patch)
treeae1c5ebffc5d9ad337b548361db9598b7989c727 /channels
parentd2fc5df36b61be61fdbc915ef2162ee7c3aef62a (diff)
Handle a SIP race condition (reinvite before an ACK) properly.
RFC 5047 explains the proper course of action to take if a reINVITE is received before the ACK from a previous invite transaction. What we are to do is to treat the reINVITE as if it were both an ACK and a reINVITE and process it normally. Later, when we receive the ACK we had been expecting, we will ignore it since its CSeq is less than the current iseqno of the sip_pvt representing this dialog. (closes issue #13849) Reported by: klaus3000 Patches: 13849_v2.patch uploaded by mmichelson (license 60) Tested by: mmichelson, klaus3000 git-svn-id: http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4@187484 f38db490-d61c-443f-a65b-d21fe96a405b
Diffstat (limited to 'channels')
-rw-r--r--channels/chan_sip.c27
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/channels/chan_sip.c b/channels/chan_sip.c
index 599007747..ca7960891 100644
--- a/channels/chan_sip.c
+++ b/channels/chan_sip.c
@@ -14435,13 +14435,26 @@ static int handle_request_invite(struct sip_pvt *p, struct sip_request *req, int
}
if (!ast_test_flag(req, SIP_PKT_IGNORE) && p->pendinginvite) {
- /* We already have a pending invite. Sorry. You are on hold. */
- p->glareinvite = seqno;
- transmit_response_reliable(p, "491 Request Pending", req);
- if (option_debug)
- ast_log(LOG_DEBUG, "Got INVITE on call where we already have pending INVITE, deferring that - %s\n", p->callid);
- /* Don't destroy dialog here */
- return 0;
+ if (!ast_test_flag(&p->flags[0], SIP_OUTGOING) && ast_test_flag(&p->flags[1], SIP_PAGE2_DIALOG_ESTABLISHED)) {
+ /* We have received a reINVITE on an incoming call to which we have sent a 200 OK but not yet received
+ * an ACK. According to RFC 5407, Section 3.1.4, the proper way to handle this race condition is to accept
+ * the reINVITE since we have established a dialog.
+ */
+
+ /* Note that this will both clear the pendinginvite flag and cancel the
+ * retransmission of the 200 OK. Basically, we're accepting this reINVITE as both an ACK
+ * and a reINVITE in one request.
+ */
+ __sip_ack(p, p->lastinvite, FLAG_RESPONSE, 0);
+ } else {
+ /* We already have a pending invite. Sorry. You are on hold. */
+ p->glareinvite = seqno;
+ transmit_response_reliable(p, "491 Request Pending", req);
+ if (option_debug)
+ ast_log(LOG_DEBUG, "Got INVITE on call where we already have pending INVITE, deferring that - %s\n", p->callid);
+ /* Don't destroy dialog here */
+ return 0;
+ }
}
p_replaces = get_header(req, "Replaces");