aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/channels
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authormmichelson <mmichelson@f38db490-d61c-443f-a65b-d21fe96a405b>2009-03-12 18:30:58 +0000
committermmichelson <mmichelson@f38db490-d61c-443f-a65b-d21fe96a405b>2009-03-12 18:30:58 +0000
commit287090e090ac5c220e244c57f6583f292d7a9dc5 (patch)
tree3499a17b8d96542e44a03ffbc10152b980810436 /channels
parent60a45693b7a3a22d99091c6ac6ea55d2c67460b6 (diff)
Merged revisions 181768 via svnmerge from
https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4 ........ r181768 | mmichelson | 2009-03-12 13:29:48 -0500 (Thu, 12 Mar 2009) | 22 lines Properly send a 487 on an INVITE we have not responded to if we receive a BYE. If we receive an INVITE from an endpoint and then later receive a BYE from that same endpoint before we have sent a final response for the INVITE, then we need to respond to the INVITE with a 487. There was logic in the code prior to this commit which seemed to exist solely to handle this situation, but there was one condition in an if statement which was incorrect. The only way we would send a 487 was if the sip_pvt had no owner channel. This made no sense since we created the owner channel when we received the INVITE, meaning that the majority of the time we would never send the 487. The 487 being sent should not rely on whether we have created a channel. Its delivery should be dependent on the current state of the initial INVITE transaction. With this commit, that logic is now correctly in place. (closes issue #14149) Reported by: legranjl Patches: 14149.patch uploaded by mmichelson (license 60) Tested by: legranjl ........ git-svn-id: http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@181769 f38db490-d61c-443f-a65b-d21fe96a405b
Diffstat (limited to 'channels')
-rw-r--r--channels/chan_sip.c2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/channels/chan_sip.c b/channels/chan_sip.c
index b8f2fe672..a2bb9fcba 100644
--- a/channels/chan_sip.c
+++ b/channels/chan_sip.c
@@ -19947,7 +19947,7 @@ static int handle_request_bye(struct sip_pvt *p, struct sip_request *req)
struct ast_channel *bridged_to;
/* If we have an INCOMING invite that we haven't answered, terminate that transaction */
- if (p->pendinginvite && !ast_test_flag(&p->flags[0], SIP_OUTGOING) && !req->ignore && !p->owner) {
+ if (p->pendinginvite && !ast_test_flag(&p->flags[0], SIP_OUTGOING) && !req->ignore) {
transmit_response_reliable(p, "487 Request Terminated", &p->initreq);
}