(closes issue #13251)

Reported by: sergee
Tested by: murf



THis is a bold move for a static release fix, but I wouldn't have
made it if I didn't feel confident (at least a *bit* confident)
that it wouldn't mess everyone up.

The reasoning goes something like this:

1. We simply cannot do anything with CDR's at the current point
(in pbx.c, after the __ast_pbx_run loop). It's way too late to
have any affect on the CDRs. The CDR is already posted and gone,
and the remnants have been cleared.

2. I was very much afraid that moving the running of the 'h'
extension down into the bridge code (where it would be now
practical to do it), would result in a lot more calls to the
'h' exten, so I implemented it as another exten under another
name, but found, to my pleasant surprise, that there was a 
1:1 correspondence to the running of the 'h' exten in the
pbx_run loop, and the new spot at the end of the bridge.
So, I ifdef'd out the current 'h' loop, and moved it into
the bridge code. The only difference I can see is the stuff
about the AST_PBX_KEEPALIVE, and hopefully, if this 
is still an important decision point, I can replicate it
if there are complaints. To be perfectly honest,
the KEEPALIVE situation is not totally clear to me,
and how it relates to a post-bridge situation is less
clear. I suspect the users will point out everything
in total clarity if this steps on anyone's toes!

3. I temporarily swap the bridge_cdr into the channel
before running the 'h' exten, which makes it possible
for users to edit the cdr before it goes out the door.
And, of course, with the endbeforehexten config var set,
the users can also get at the billsec/duration vals.
After the h exten finishes, the cdr is swapped back
and processing continues as normal.

Please, all who deal with CDR's, please test this version
of Asterisk, and file bug reports as appropriate!



git-svn-id: http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4@139347 f38db490-d61c-443f-a65b-d21fe96a405b

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions