diff options
author | bweschke <bweschke@f38db490-d61c-443f-a65b-d21fe96a405b> | 2006-09-20 03:51:01 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | bweschke <bweschke@f38db490-d61c-443f-a65b-d21fe96a405b> | 2006-09-20 03:51:01 +0000 |
commit | 40a6ddcf9441cec7ac54b0e6455754aa418dd4ec (patch) | |
tree | d94e1d9512e347538a0c5e42cd4ee1ce4091bde5 | |
parent | 349f2660ae6ea37a57c5e76e59a3063c4d6ca75f (diff) |
Merged revisions 42133 via svnmerge from
https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.2
........
r42133 | bweschke | 2006-09-06 14:16:41 -0400 (Wed, 06 Sep 2006) | 6 lines
Look ma! No more deadlocks! <sic>
As posted from #7458 and others similar to it in Mantis:
p->app_lock was a mutex really designed for use with agents not in callback mode. That being the case, I've tried to code it so that when callback mode is used, the app_lock mutex will not be locked/unlocked at all. Please let me know how you make out - and if you continue to deadlock now, please reproduce the deadlock logging information and post to Mantis.
........
git-svn-id: http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@43307 f38db490-d61c-443f-a65b-d21fe96a405b
-rw-r--r-- | channels/chan_agent.c | 19 |
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/channels/chan_agent.c b/channels/chan_agent.c index d5c327965..7ab6f61b0 100644 --- a/channels/chan_agent.c +++ b/channels/chan_agent.c @@ -815,7 +815,8 @@ static int agent_hangup(struct ast_channel *ast) ast_mutex_unlock(&p->lock); } /* Release ownership of the agent to other threads (presumably running the login app). */ - ast_mutex_unlock(&p->app_lock); + if (ast_strlen_zero(p->loginchan)) + ast_mutex_unlock(&p->app_lock); } return 0; } @@ -955,7 +956,7 @@ static struct ast_channel *agent_new(struct agent_pvt *p, int state) * implemented in the kernel for this. */ p->app_sleep_cond = 0; - if(ast_mutex_trylock(&p->app_lock)) { + if(ast_strlen_zero(p->loginchan) && ast_mutex_trylock(&p->app_lock)) { if (p->chan) { ast_queue_frame(p->chan, &ast_null_frame); ast_mutex_unlock(&p->lock); /* For other thread to read the condition. */ @@ -971,7 +972,20 @@ static struct ast_channel *agent_new(struct agent_pvt *p, int state) ast_mutex_unlock(&p->app_lock); return NULL; } + } else if (!ast_strlen_zero(p->loginchan)) { + if (p->chan) + ast_queue_frame(p->chan, &ast_null_frame); + if (!p->chan) { + ast_log(LOG_WARNING, "Agent disconnected while we were connecting the call\n"); + p->owner = NULL; + tmp->tech_pvt = NULL; + p->app_sleep_cond = 1; + ast_channel_free( tmp ); + ast_mutex_unlock(&p->lock); /* For other thread to read the condition. */ + return NULL; + } } + ast_indicate(p->chan, AST_CONTROL_UNHOLD); p->owning_app = pthread_self(); /* After the above step, there should not be any blockers. */ if (p->chan) { @@ -979,7 +993,6 @@ static struct ast_channel *agent_new(struct agent_pvt *p, int state) ast_log( LOG_ERROR, "A blocker exists after agent channel ownership acquired\n" ); CRASH; } - ast_indicate(p->chan, AST_CONTROL_UNHOLD); } return tmp; } |