diff options
| author | Guy Harris <guy@alum.mit.edu> | 2015-07-05 19:02:51 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Guy Harris <guy@alum.mit.edu> | 2015-07-06 02:04:06 +0000 |
| commit | 94eb30ab044858581a60c3ecc2a8555b6c426d31 (patch) | |
| tree | 43502c534eafd93eeffd2d110412dcc7367458a6 /wsutil/frequency-utils.c | |
| parent | 35399887f41d6c5fb42f18a5ce85553d2522d3a6 (diff) | |
Add a comment.
Why, oh why, are channel numbers used for 802.11?
Change-Id: Ie26987dfeaad2ce0ead0eef72339f966aadeeecd
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/9510
Reviewed-by: Guy Harris <guy@alum.mit.edu>
Diffstat (limited to 'wsutil/frequency-utils.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | wsutil/frequency-utils.c | 12 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/wsutil/frequency-utils.c b/wsutil/frequency-utils.c index 2ee6bc9d8c..43cb323864 100644 --- a/wsutil/frequency-utils.c +++ b/wsutil/frequency-utils.c @@ -35,7 +35,17 @@ typedef struct freq_cvt_s { #define FREQ_STEP 5 /* MHz. This seems to be consistent, thankfully */ -/* From "802.11 Wireless Networks: The Definitive Guide", 2nd Ed. by Matthew Gast */ +/* + * From "802.11 Wireless Networks: The Definitive Guide", 2nd Ed. by + * Matthew Gast. + * + * XXX - what about Japanese channels 182 through 196, also in the 4.9 GHz + * band, with frequencies of 4910 + (chan - 182)*5 MHz? + * + * XXX - what about the U.S. public safety 4.9 GHz band? + * + * XXX - what about 802.11ad? + */ static freq_cvt_t freq_cvt[] = { { 2412, 2472, 1, TRUE }, /* Table 12-1, p 257 */ { 2484, 2484, 14, TRUE }, /* Table 12-1, p 257 */ |