| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Since a while ago, the data architecture was changed so that TBF is
guaranteed to always have a MS object associated. Hence, it makes no
sense to pass the MS object as a separate param as we can take it from
tbf object and makes code less confusing.
Change-Id: Idc0c76cf6f007afa4236480cdad0d8e99dabec5f
|
|
Change-Id: I68491fe2c643262e35b4d4f1ecac34afcf61848f
|
|
Change-Id: I1686a72eb9f9014ed3365376bc43d59d60bee8a5
|
|
Change-Id: I48fc1eac37eeb74649bfc0888e06afc0079a58f8
|
|
Before this patch, allocate_usf() was implemented to only allocate 1 USF
per TBF, regardless of the available ul_slot mask.
As a result, only 1 slot at max was allocated to any TBF. That's a pity
because usual multislot classes like 12 support up to 2 UL slots per TBF
(in common TS with DL).
This patch reworks allocate_usf() to allocate as many UL multislots as
possible (given mslot class, current USF availability, TFI availability,
related DL TBF slots for the same MS, etc.).
As a result, it can be seen that AllocTest results change substantially
and maximum concurrent TBF allocation drops under some conditions.
That happens due to more USFs being reserved (because each TBF has now
more UL slots reserved). Hence now USF exhaustion becomes the usual
limitation factor as per the number of concurrent TBFs than can be
handled per TRX (as opposed to TFIs previously).
Some of the biggest limitations in test appear though because really
high end multislot classes are used, which can consume high volumes of
UL slots (USFs), and which are probably not the most extended devices in
the field.
Moreover, in general the curren timeslot allocator for a given
multislot class will in general try to optimize the DL side gathering
most of the possible timeslots there. That means, for instance on ms
class 12 (4 Tx, 4Rx, 5 Sum), 4 DL slots and 1 UL slot will still be
selected. But in the case where only 3 PDCHs are available, then with
this new multi-slot UL support a TBF will reserve 3 DL slots and 2 UL
slots, while before this patch it would only taken 1 UL slot instead of
2.
This USF exhaustion situation can be improved in the future by
parametrizing (VTY command?) the maximum amount of UL slots that a TBF
can reserve, making for instance a default value of 2, meaning usual
classes can gather up 2 UL timelosts at a time while forbidding high-end
hungry classes to gather up to 8 UL timeslots.
Another approach would be to dynamically limit the amount of allowed
reservable UL timeslots based on current USF reservation load.
Related: OS#2282
Change-Id: Id97cc6e3b769511b591b1694549e0dac55227c43
|
|
The old VTY command is marked as deprecated and still overrides the use
in case it's used.
Related: SYS#5358
Depends: libosmocore.git Change-Id I74fb0a3afc1ac4aadbfc609b882d929401f790eb
Depends: osmo-bsc.git Change-Id I8b97ea11bad5fe05f2f634945b5703ee9abde81d
Change-Id: I46f2a955b157a409055fca7fb917dc4f75482426
|
|
Change-Id: Idcc4875592c81f17ac98c4f6098492b3d9dd33d2
|
|
Let's disable category here since we don't care about its formatting here.
In any case, every test relying on logging output validation should
always explicitly state the config to avoid issues in the future if
default values change.
Change-Id: I7f9c56313cfaa74ebe666f44763a83d8102f5484
Related: OS#5034
|
|
Improve the naming of the function to match it's purpose.
Related: SYS#5354
Change-Id: Ib8e4ae734503fd6f6695d9d6767d809e1bf79d22
|
|
All vectors should be valid, since they were generated by an MS.
As can be seen, osmo-pcu fails to decode one of the vectors.
Change-Id: I37a2ddd394eeffa1cae0f3e419eeee0200a57fcf
OS#4955
Change-Id: Ib5677048f5668185ffe752f97c97d5612eee4d72
|
|
A new nacc_fsm is introduced per MS object, with its partner priv
structure struct nacc_fsm_ctx, which exists and is available in the MS
object only during the duration of the NACC procedure.
The NACC context is created on an MS whenever a Pkt Cell Change
Notification is received on Uplink RLCMAC, which asks for neighbor
information of a given ARFCN+BSIC.
First, the target ARFCN+BSIC needs to be translated into a CGI-PS
(RAC+CI) address. That's done by asking the BSC through the Neighbour
Resolution Service available in osmo-bsc using the CTRL interface.
Once the CGI-PS of the target cell is known, PCU starts a RIM RAN-INFO
request against the SGSN (which will route the request as needed), and
wait for a response containing the SI bits from the target cell.
After the SI are received, the scheduler is instructed to eventually
poll a TBF for the MS originating the CCN, so that we can send the SI
encapsulated into multiple Packet Neighbor Cell Data messages on the
downlink.
One all the SI bits are sent, the scheduler is instructed to send a
Packet Cell Change Continue message.
Once the message above has been sent, the FSM autodestroys itself.
Caches are also introduced in this patch which allows for re-using
recently known translations ARFCN+BSIC -> CGI-PS and CGI-PS -> SI_INFO
respectively.
Change-Id: Id35f40d05f3e081f32fddbf1fa34cb338db452ca
|
|
Under some circumstances, it could happen that a DL TBF is created as a
GPRS TBF due to not yet having enough information of the MS, and only
after the TBF is created the PCU gains that information and upgrades the
MS mode to "EGPRS". Hence, there's the possibility to run into a
situation where a GPRS TBF is attached to a EGPRS MS.
It may also happen sometimes that despite the TBF and the MS be EGPRS,
there's need to further limit the DL MCS to use, eg. MCS1-4 (GMSK).
As a result, when asking for the current DL (M)CS to use, we must tell
the MS which kind of limitations we want to apply. The later reasoning
was already implemented when GPRS+EGPRS multiplexing was added, but the
former was not being checked. Hence, by further spreading through the
call stack the "req_kind_mode" we match both cases.
Related: OS#4973
Change-Id: Ic0276ce045660713129f0c72f1158a3321c5977f
|
|
Change-Id: Ied3e02a12145112fafa12282ed7aefa5b0fa6eb6
|
|
Before this patch, shared logic with EGPRS case would allow keeping
MCS>4.
Change-Id: I94cbf0c120fd37deb2dfd077d35b3811c7da0675
|
|
This patch doesn't really tests whether osmo-pcu can work on a multi-bts
environment, but it prepares the data structures to be able to do so at
any later point in time.
Change-Id: I6b10913f46c19d438c4e250a436a7446694b725a
|
|
There's no real point in using C++ there, and using C++ makes the
compiler fail to use llist_head in multi-bts patches added later due to:
"""
'offsetof' within non-standard-layout type is conditionally-supported
"""
Change-Id: I8965b5cc5a713e64788b5b6aa183d3035341ddbb
|
|
There's no real use of C++ in that file, and it causes problems when
using llist_head entry macros in future patches adding initial support
for multiple BTS in PCU object, so let's move it to plain C.
Change-Id: Ic771a89fd78b5e66151a5384f0ff6a8895589466
|
|
There's no BTS single global object anymore, get rid of those APIs. Move
users to use "pcu->bts", which will evolve to a linked list in the
future.
Change-Id: I9cf762b0d3cb9e2cc3582727e07fa82c8e183ec5
|
|
Previous work on BTS class started to get stuff out of the C++ struct
into a C struct (BTS -> struct gprs_glcmac_bts) so that some parts of
it were accessible from C code. Doing so, however, ended up being messy
too, since all code needs to be switching from one object to another,
which actually refer to the same logical component.
Let's instead rejoin the structures and make sure the struct is
accessible and usable from both C and C++ code by rewriting all methods
to be C compatible and converting 3 allocated suboject as pointers.
This way BTS can internally still use those C++ objects while providing
a clean APi to both C and C++ code.
Change-Id: I7d12c896c5ded659ca9d3bff4cf3a3fc857db9dd
|
|
Change-Id: I997bc52f0d924c8f2a0b1d6cf23af98828ad4258
|
|
Otherwise some state may be left from one test to another.
Change-Id: I18e2fe7dd1cc5940570252a2a6a106de49d8a7dd
|
|
Change-Id: I816d49e732d0fc7a3c9aa1f0e9a83b83d25e6a32
|
|
Change-Id: I3e1c65eb3cccff565d5d84588bdce93a47909a0f
|
|
Change-Id: I2b00a83279dccd4feeeeb95e34878c4405e7972c
|
|
Change-Id: I0b82ab59edd58d60e5581c707dc49f58de0ba203
|
|
Change-Id: I2fdd9c8a7393157183fff64084bb10e2a3b1dc63
|
|
Change-Id: I0cac5c12dff2e90b52d00383a00b4b94a9603a0a
|
|
Currently the BTS object (and gprs_rlcmac_bts struct) are used to hold
both PCU global fields and BTS specific fields, all mangled together.
The BTS is even accessed in lots of places by means of a singleton.
This patch introduces a new struct gprs_pcu object aimed at holding all
global state, and several fields are already moved from BTS to it. The
new object can be accessed as global variable "the_pcu", reusing and
including an already exisitng "the_pcu" global variable only used for
bssgp related purposes so far.
This is only a first step towards having a complete split global pcu and
BTS, some fields are still kept in BTS and will be moved over follow-up
smaller patches in the future (since this patch is already quite big).
So far, the code still only supports one BTS, which can be accessed
using the_pcu->bts. In the future that field will be replaced with a
list, and the BTS singletons will be removed.
The cur_fn output changes in TbfTest are actually a side effect fix,
since the singleton main_bts() now points internally to the_pcu->bts,
hence the same we allocate and assign in the test. Beforehand, "the_bts"
was allocated in the stack while main_bts() still returned an unrelated
singleton BTS object instance.
Related: OS#4935
Change-Id: I88e3c6471b80245ce3798223f1a61190f14aa840
|
|
When allocating multiple slots for a UE the following example
is not allowed 'UU----UU' for a UE class 12.
The time slot number can not roll over 7 and move to 0.
44.060 or 45.002 only specifies contigous however it was unclear
it this is an allowed pattern.
Only the example 45.002 B.3 in release 12 cleared this up.
It gives an example for a multi slot class 5 UE which has 7 possible
configuration this means the rolled over is not allowed.
Multislot class type 2 UE doesn't have this limitation.
Further if a UE supports 8 time slots this is not a limitation because
the window size (45.002 B.1) can include all time slots.
Releated: SYS#5073
Change-Id: I16019bdbe741b37b83b62749b840a3b7f4ddc6c7
|
|
When both TBFs (Dl, Ul), are detached, ms_detach_tbf() will call
ms_start_timer() which will hold a reference of the MS (ms_ref()) and
wait for X seconds (VTY config, T=-2030, 60 seconds by default) before
unrefing the MS, which will trigger ms_update_status() finally (ref==0)
and will in turn call cb.ms_idle(), which will tell the ms_storage to
free the MS.
This mechanism is used to keep MS objects around for a certain time so
that when new TBFs are established, we have cached interesting
information about the MS, ready to use.
However, in AllocTest, tons of MS are allocated in a loop calling a
function (such as test_alloc_b_ul_dl()). In that function, a BTS is
allocated in the stack and at the end of the function BTS::cleanup() is
called due to implicit destructor, which ends up calling
ms_storage::cleanup() which removes all MS from its list and frees them
*if they are not idle*. The problem here, is that due to T=-2030, an
extra reference is hold and hence the ms is not considered idle
(ms_is_idle() checks ms->ref==0). As a result, the MS is never freed,
because we don't use libosmocore mainloop here (and in any case, it
would take 60 seconds to free it).
By setting the timeout of T=-2030 to 0, ms_start_timer will avoid using
the timer and will also avoid holding the extra reference, hence
allowing ms_storage to free the object during cleanup().
This fix really helps in improving performance for AllocTest specially
after MS object contains a rate_ctr. As tons of MS objects were left
alive, they stood in the rate_ctr single per-process queue, making the
test last crazy amount of time and spending 50% of the time or more
iterating the list full of MS related rate counters.
Change-Id: I6b6ebe8903e4fe76da5e09b02b6ef28542007b6c
|
|
It is expected that the tbf object is freed at any moment in time, for
instance if osmo-pcu drops PCUIF connection with osmo-bts. I couldn't
find any reason why it would e dangerous to free the tbf, so let's
remove this message.
related: OS#4779
Change-Id: I4ab5ccaa5bf6257b18d8fd5ba06baab083821817
|
|
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
|
|
Change-Id: I94864c5fa2688fc91b8b6077a14ad098851afdc7
Depends: libosmocore.git Change-Id I506190aae9217c0956e4b5764d1a0c0772268e93
|
|
According to:
* 3GPP TS 44.060 version 16.0.0 "9.3.1a Delayed release of downlink Temporary Block Flow"
* 3GPP TS 44.064 version 16.0.0 "6.4.2.2 Unconfirmed Information (UI) Dummy command"
LLC UI Dummy frames are to be used when there no more data to send, only
in order to delay the release of a TBF. Hence, while not incorrect per
se, makes no sense to send those LLC UI Dummy frames inserted into
rlcmac blocks which already contain other LLC frames, since the MS in
that case is already being kept active.
It only makes sense to send those LLC UI Dummy frames when we have
nothing else to send, that is, alone inside a RLCMAC block without other
LLC frames.
Related: OS#4849
Change-Id: Ifae1a7b2b3dfad8df19585063088ba0df2749c8f
|
|
In previous status, if USF for GPRS-only MS was selected, then EGPRS
TBFs were skipped and either a GPRS TBF was selected or a Dummy Block
was sent. That means the behavior was unfair towards EGPRS TBFs, because
sometimes they were skipped in favor of GPRS ones.
This patch imporves the situation in the above mentioned USF scenario, by
first, under specific conditions, allowing selection of an EGPRS TBF and
then forcing it to transmit in EGPRS-GMSK (MCS1-4) so that the
USF-targeted MS can still decode the USF, while at the same time
providing more fairness by allowing the EGPRS TBF to transmit data.
The specific conditions mentioned above are, mainly, related to the fact
that once a DL data block has been sent, and hence a BSN was assigned to
it, it cannot be retransmitted later using another MCS, since lower
MCS1-4 wouldn't be able to contain higher MCS RLC payload.
The set of conditions could be expanded in the future by also selecting
the EGPRS TBF if retransmition is required and the block to be
retransmitted was originally transmitted as MCS1-4.
Related: OS#4544
Change-Id: I9af23e175435fe9ae7b0e4119ad52fcd4707b9ca
|
|
Change-Id: If84c4b3cb870068a85405116f1d505ffcff9c26e
|
|
There's actually 3 errors:
* Its value should be updated, not the pointer itself
* Value should be increased, not decreased
* bitvec_read_field() API is already advancing it, no need to do it
Fixes: OS#4838
Change-Id: I009abc373794e148091e637ffee80c6461960945
|
|
The assumption that TLLI 0x00000000 is invalid and can be used
as the initializer is wrong. Similar to TMSI, 0x00000000 is a
perfectly valid value, while 0xffffffff is reserved - use it.
According to 3GPP TS 23.003, section 2.4, a TMSI/P-TMSI with
all 32 bits equal to 1 is special and shall not be allocated by
the network. The reason is that it must be stored on the SIM,
where 'ff'O represents the erased state. According to section
2.6 of the same document, a local/foreign TLLI is derived from
P-TMSI, so the same rule applies to TLLI.
I manually checked and corrected all occurances of 'tlli' in the
code. The test expectations have been adjusted with this command:
$ find tests/ -name "*.err" | xargs sed -i "s/0x00000000/0xffffffff/g"
so there should be no behavior change. The only exception is
the 'TypesTest', where TLLI 0xffffffff is being encoded and
expected in the hexdump, so I regenerated the test output.
Change-Id: Ie89fab75ecc1d8b5e238d3ff214ea7ac830b68b5
Related: OS#4844
|
|
BTS simply notifies the PCU about the supported MCS, and PCU is
responsible for providing correct data formatting supported for the BTS
and the target MS.
Related: OS#4544
Change-Id: Ifcf23771bd23afc64ca6fea38948f98f2d134ecb
|
|
For instance if PCU received DL data to be sent to an MS from an SGSN,
and the MS is not currently cached in the PCU (because there's no TBF
active for it), it will page it and transmit the DL data to it.
The SGSN is capable of sending (EGPRS) MS Class information in that same
DL data message, so it's the one responsible for providing that
information if not available at the PCU.
In the PCU if we don't have information about that MS and SGSN didn't
provide us information about it, we cannot assume the MS is going to be
EGPRS capable and even less expecting a specific EGPRS MS class.
So let's drop this code.
Related: OS#4544
Change-Id: Icce66cadb51af25ae0c3b3719940eccb548fe33b
|
|
Some tests were wrong (TypesTest) and required modification, since they
were setting a EGPRS MS but then expecting a GPRS assignment.
Change-Id: I9d3ee21c765054a36bd22352e48bde5ffca9225a
|
|
Take into account the MCS values supported by the BTS. In osmo-bts,
in general all MCS are enabled if "mode egprs" is selected in BSC,
and none otherwise.
Change-Id: Ie8f0215ba17da1e545e98bec9325c02f1e8efaea
|
|
This way everytime any program or test initiates a BTS object, the
bts_data structure has the same values.
Change-Id: Iffd6eecb1f08bda0091f45e2ef7c9c63b42e10b3
|
|
Change-Id: I889498c75a78fd8aa406cff5600e4773785782de
|
|
If SGSN provides us with MS class information upon DL data, let's use it
and set it in an already existing MS object if not yet known.
Also remove all unneeded code passing ms_class to append_data() which
would simply try to (again) set the ms_class.
Change-Id: I4979c9344bffd3ba7657bbab94981d233eab801f
|
|
Change-Id: I66a8254ee392ad75226c58b7df5746f409463f0f
|
|
Before this patch, it would always allocate all TBFs on the first TRX
until all TFIs were filled, then second, and so on. But it would
actually fail around 8th MS requesting an UL TBF because despite a TFI
was successfuly assigned, because all USFs were already exhausted for
that PDCH.
Related: OS#1775
Change-Id: Iccfc8acfbfdc258ed16cc5af01f12b376fe73b72
|
|
Avoid passing tons of params to internal helper function
tbf_nel_dl_assignment() in order to either fetch again the ms object or
create a new one. Let's instead create the ms function earlier if needed
and fill it with all the discovered information prior to calling the
helper function. This provides cleaner code and also better log output.
This way we also avoid trying to fill the MS twice and unneeded
getter+setter for TA.
tbf::imsi(): There' always an ms, so simply forward call to
ms()->imsi().
We can also get rid of assign_imsi, since the modified code is the only
place where it's used and there's already some code in place there to
update the MS. We instead merge it with set_imsi and keep the
duplication code to catch possible bugs from callers.
Move merge_and_clear_ms from tbf class to GprsMS, where it really
belongs.
Change-Id: Id18098bac3cff26fc4a8d2f419e21641a1f4c83b
|
|
The BTS field will be used in code paths after next patch changes,
otherwise the test fails accessing the NULL pointer.
Change-Id: I5098292bdafa9f4f70fef1a053b80a33deca722c
|
|
This is another step forward towards a more clear data model where a TBF
always has a MS object (which may be lacking some information, and at a
later point when more information is found, it may actually be a
duplicated MS object and hence one duplicate removed and the TBF moved
to the object being kept).
This helps for instance in removing duplicated information stored in
the TBF which is really per MS, like ms_class, ta, etc. Since there's
always a MS object there's no need to keep a duplicate in both classes
in case there's no MS object.
It can already be seen looking at unit test logging that this kind of
data model already provides better information.
Some unit test parts were needed to adapt to the new model too.
Change-Id: I3cdf4d53e222777d5a2bf4c5aad3a7414105f14c
|
