aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tests/tbf/TbfTest.err
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJacob Erlbeck <jerlbeck@sysmocom.de>2015-09-07 18:49:00 +0200
committerJacob Erlbeck <jerlbeck@sysmocom.de>2015-09-11 11:52:02 +0200
commit2db0f08e08d074dc2876b780c76f7261851e7296 (patch)
treede7b47483ea75519b7a22297c74c7adeada9d2d6 /tests/tbf/TbfTest.err
parent7c8d39a67b7568cda38829c774ea541250f3142f (diff)
bssgp: Use measured leak rate for flow control
The leak rate sent to the SGSN does not reflect the current CS level, lost frames, and control message overhead. So the SGSN cannot do proper queue control under non-optimal conditions. This commit computes the leak rate for the last flow control interval by computing the maximum theoretical leak rate and basically substracting control blocks, nacked blocks, and reduced block sizes due to CS downgrade. By using this approach, the value will by more stable on low load, where the value will tend to be near the value derived from the configuration. On full load the transmitted value is completely derived from the measurements. Note that the MS default values are no adapted to the adapted BVC leak rate, since a single MS which has a lower link quality would otherwise be reducing the rate of another MS with good radio conditions, which would not make much sense if they did not share any PDCH. Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/tbf/TbfTest.err')
-rw-r--r--tests/tbf/TbfTest.err2
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tests/tbf/TbfTest.err b/tests/tbf/TbfTest.err
index 70b5c570..2869ffd0 100644
--- a/tests/tbf/TbfTest.err
+++ b/tests/tbf/TbfTest.err
@@ -360,6 +360,7 @@ Polling is already sheduled for TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xffeeddcc DIR=DL STATE=FLOW), so
Sending data request: trx=0 ts=4 sapi=5 arfcn=0 fn=91 block=9 data=07 00 28 0a 41 c6 c7 43 c0 01 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xffeeddcc DIR=DL STATE=FLOW) downlink acknowledge
- ack: (BSN=85)"RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR"(BSN=20) R=ACK I=NACK
+TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xffeeddcc DIR=DL STATE=FLOW) DL analysis, range=0:21, lost=0, recv=21, skipped=0, bsn=127, info='RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR$..........................................'
- got ack for BSN=20
- got ack for BSN=19
- got ack for BSN=18
@@ -395,6 +396,7 @@ Polling is already sheduled for TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xffeeddcc DIR=DL STATE=FLOW), so
Sending data request: trx=0 ts=4 sapi=5 arfcn=0 fn=95 block=10 data=07 00 2a 4d 43 c0 01 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xffeeddcc DIR=DL STATE=FLOW) downlink acknowledge
- ack: (BSN=86)"RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR"(BSN=21) R=ACK I=NACK
+TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xffeeddcc DIR=DL STATE=FLOW) DL analysis, range=21:22, lost=0, recv=1, skipped=0, bsn=20, info='R$..............................................................'
- got ack for BSN=21
- V(B): (V(A)=22)""(V(S)-1=21) A=Acked N=Nacked U=Unacked X=Resend-Unacked I=Invalid
Scheduling data message at RTS for DL TFI=0 (TRX=0, TS=4) prio=4