PCU: Fix TA adjustment

Promblem:
 TA provided from L1 PH-DATA-IND is a relative amount of TA adjustment to actual TA
 being used for given TBF. The current TA update algorithm in PCU simply applies the relative
 amount of TA to given TBF but does not take into account of current TA.
 As a result, the PCU will request wrong TA jump for given TBF if the MS is moving away from
 BTS more than 2 km.

 Related issue: http://osmocom.org/issues/2611

Fixes:
- The PCU needs increase or decrease current TA of given TBF on receiving of relative
  amount of TA adjustment provided by PH-DATA-IND from L1
- The PCU needs to set absolute TA of given TBF on receiving absolute TA provided by
  PH-RA-IND from L1.

Change-Id: I65212f8203f1a35278890f51db038d689b2493d5

1 files changed, 49 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/src/bts.cpp b/src/bts.cpp
index e41b1fa9..6bdbb859 100644
--- a/src/bts.cpp
+++ b/src/bts.cpp
@@ -1619,8 +1619,45 @@ int gprs_rlcmac_pdch::rcv_block_gprs(uint8_t *data, uint8_t data_len, uint32_t f
 	return rc;
 }
 
-void bts_update_tbf_ta(const char *p, uint32_t fn, uint8_t trx_no, uint8_t ts,
-		       uint8_t ta)
+/* update TA based on TA provided by PH-DATA-IND */
+void update_tbf_ta(struct gprs_rlcmac_ul_tbf *tbf, int8_t ta_delta)
+{
+	int16_t ta_adj;
+	uint8_t ta_target;
+
+	if (ta_delta) {
+		/* adjust TA based on TA provided by PH-DATA-IND */
+		ta_adj = tbf->ta() + ta_delta;
+
+		/* limit target TA in range 0..63 bits */
+		ta_target = ta_limit(ta_adj);
+
+		LOGP(DL1IF, LOGL_INFO, "PH-DATA-IND is updating TLLI=0x%08x: TA %u -> %u on "
+				"TRX = %d, TS = %d, FN = %d\n",
+				tbf->tlli(), tbf->ta(), ta_target,
+				tbf->trx->trx_no , tbf->poll_ts, tbf->poll_fn);
+		tbf->set_ta(ta_target);
+	}
+}
+
+/* set TA based on TA provided by PH-RA-IND */
+void set_tbf_ta(struct gprs_rlcmac_ul_tbf *tbf, uint8_t ta)
+{
+	uint8_t ta_target;
+
+	if (tbf->ta() != ta) {
+		/* limit target TA in range 0..63 bits */
+		ta_target = ta_limit(ta);
+
+		LOGP(DL1IF, LOGL_INFO, "PH-RA-IND is updating TLLI=0x%08x: TA %u -> %u on "
+				"TRX = %d, TS = %d, FN = %d\n",
+				tbf->tlli(), tbf->ta(), ta_target,
+				tbf->trx->trx_no , tbf->poll_ts, tbf->poll_fn);
+		tbf->set_ta(ta_target);
+	}
+}
+
+void bts_update_tbf_ta(const char *p, uint32_t fn, uint8_t trx_no, uint8_t ts, int8_t ta, bool is_rach)
 {
 	struct gprs_rlcmac_ul_tbf *tbf =
 		bts_main_data()->bts->ul_tbf_by_poll_fn(fn, trx_no, ts);
@@ -1628,11 +1665,16 @@ void bts_update_tbf_ta(const char *p, uint32_t fn, uint8_t trx_no, uint8_t ts,
 		LOGP(DL1IF, LOGL_DEBUG, "[%s] update TA = %u ignored due to "
 		     "unknown UL TBF on TRX = %d, TS = %d, FN = %d\n",
 		     p, ta, trx_no, ts, fn);
-	else if (tbf->ta() != ta) {
-		LOGP(DL1IF, LOGL_INFO, "[%s] Updating TA %u -> %u on "
-		     "TRX = %d, TS = %d, FN = %d\n",
-		     p, tbf->ta(), ta, trx_no, ts, fn);
-		tbf->set_ta(ta);
+	else {
+		/* we need to distinguish TA information provided by L1
+		 * from PH-DATA-IND and PHY-RA-IND so that we can properly
+		 * update TA for given TBF
+		 */
+		if (is_rach)
+			set_tbf_ta(tbf, (uint8_t)ta);
+		else
+			update_tbf_ta(tbf, ta);
+
 	}
 }