| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
upper layers"
This reverts commit d981794113efef3cc1195cde82043c5c66937b11.
osmo-bts is forwarding the msgbs as they come from lapdm to the RSL on
the wire, which means we end up sending the osmocom-specific IEs on the
wire, something which was not envisioned when adding this IE.
Change-Id: I0ab0d5b545b4862e72eb1842edd07ca2e4955311
Related: OS#6142
|
|
This makes it possible to track GSM time in the upper layers.
The existing RSL_IE_FRAME_NUMBER and RSL_IE_STARTNG_TIME cannot be used
there, since those are 16bit fields containing Relative FN values.
The IE needs to be added before the L3_INFO one, because user code
usually assumes the msgb->l3 pointing to L3_INFO value extends until the
end of the message, using msgb3_len(msg). Regarding having an extra IE
at the middle, it's not a big problem since the libosmocore version
submitting this commit to the upper layers is the same which will also
be parsing it through rsl_tlv_parse() later on by the app.
Related: OS#3626
Change-Id: Id62c18f49f270449067b25b7104eb8b47f1955ec
|
|
According to 3GPP TS 44.005, section 4.2.2 "Priority":
a) on DCCH, a SAPI=0 frame always has higher priority than SAPI=3;
b) on ACCH, the priority arrangement is more complex:
b1) if a SAPI = 3 frame is awaiting transmission, two SAPI=0
frames shall not be sent in consecutive SACCH frames;
b2) on the network side (LAPDM_MODE_BTS), it must also be ensured
that any SAPI=3 frame is followed by at least one SAPI=0 frame;
b3) a SAPI = 0 frame may be repeated in the next SACCH period
if the Repeated SACCH is supported (see 3GPP TS 44.006, section 11).
We definitely need to extend our testing coverage to ensure that
we implement b) correctly, but for now let's focus on DCCH:
a) for DCCH, ensure that SAPI=0 frames preceed SAPI=3 ones;
b) for ACCH, re-use the existing round-robin implementation.
Change-Id: Ia3780bce1222b312ae2fd2d21496a4d6c5ccb6e0
Related: SYS#5047, OS#4731
|
|
Recently we've encountered a situation where during MT SMS delivery,
the func=SABM for SAPI=3 was sent on Downlink *before* the BTS
replied with the func=UA for SAPI=0 (contetion resolution procedure,
where we echo the (RR) Paging Response back to the MS).
This change adds a unit test reprodicing the problem.
Change-Id: Ied0f8bb683de8e37bcfa984c2877aa1cec1c0b4b
Related: SYS#5047, OS#4731
|
|
We intentionally do not match stderr output because it contains
non-deterministic messages (e.g. pointer addresses), so let's
make sure that all test specific messages go to stdout.
Change-Id: Ia52f8e811cee9d3e1cd5fcda49a9134ccaa31f7f
|
|
Some Abis/RSL messages such as "Release Indication" contained 3 extra
bytes from an L3 Information header which should not be there according
to specs in GSM 08.58 (section 8.3 "Radio link layer management
messages"). Other RSL messages were affected by the same issue, except
for "Establish Indication", which had already a workaround in
send_rslms_dlsap.
This commit fixes the issue in a generic way, removes the "Establish
Indication" and fixes the test accounting for the bug, as it otherwise
fails after applying the changes.
Fixes: OS#1635, OS#2336
Change-Id: Ibb116214e8b1798d65a8b0917150496a3c14f344
|
|
If LAPDm receives an I-Frame while there already is an I-Frame in the
tx_queue the code generates an additional RR (to acknowledge the
received I-Frame). Instead, N(R) of the I-Frame in the tx_queue should
be updated to ACK the data.
|
|
Regression test for LAPDm recording the current state
|
|
Currently it takes 3s to establish a SAPI 3 SACCH connection with
osmo-bts. This is due to the fact, that a broken SABME request is
sent first and and is ignored by the MS. Then, after a T200 timeout
(2s) the SABME command is sent again (this time correctly) and
answered by the MS.
The first SABME message is broken (it has a length field of 3 and
ends with 3 bytes from the tail of the original RSL message),
because of it is expected throughout lapdm.c that msg buffers
containing RSL have msg->l2h == msg->data. Some abis input drivers
fulfill this but IPA doesn't, thus the 3 bytes of the IPA header
are still part of the msg and confuse length computation.
Since internal fields of the msg are modified directly, this is
difficult to see.
This patch adds a new function msgb_pull_to_l3() that explicitely
skips over all headers prepending L3 and therefore resets l1h and
l2h. This function is then used instead of msgb_pull_l2h() which
only worked correctly when msg->l2h == msg->data. In addition,
code manipulating msg->tail and msg->len directly has been replaced
by calls to msgb_trim().
Note that this patch does not fix all issues of this case in the LADP
related code.
Ticket: SYS#192
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
|
|
Since e.g. the IPA input driver leaves it's specific header in front
of msg->l2h, so that msg->l2h != msg->data. The lapdm code does not expect this at least in
rslms_rx_rll_est_req().
This patch modifies the test program to add a dummy L1 header to
generated messages (unless the test would abort when doing so).
Note that the ok file reflects the current state which is not
correct.
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
|
|
This adds and uses a wrapper for lapdm_phsap_dequeue_prim() that
prints information about the message that has been taken from the
queue.
|
|
This test case processes RSL establish requests for SMS (SAPI 3)
on the SDCCH and the SACCH channels. The TX queues are checked
after processing each message.
Ticket: SYS#192
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
|
|
The issue about the wrong padding has been found when creating the
testcase in commit 15f740caa3a1ef681b3a5564daf6dfccb7b1e489 but the
patch to fix that was never proposed by inclusion by its author.
The issue about about the establish confirm carrying data with
a wrong size is still present.
|
|
After reception of SABM, the network responds with UA and enters the
establised multiframe state. If UA is not received by mobile, the SABM
is transmitted again, and the network must respond with UA again, unless
it is from a different mobile.
Add LAPDm collision test (contention resolution on network side).
|
|
This was found while implementing handover on a sysmobts. When we
receive a channel release request for a channel that was never really
activated (set_lapdm_context() was not called) we segfault in
lapd_recv_dlsap().
We now return early with -EINVAL in rslms_rx_rll() if we receive a
message that assumes set_lapdm_context() was already called.
These are:
* RSL_MT_UNIT_DATA_REQ
* RSL_MT_DATA_REQ
* RSL_MT_SUSP_REQ
* RSL_MT_REL_REQ
A test case was added to trigger the issue.
|
|
This code should not play with the internals of the msgb like this,
this code got introduced in af48bed55607931307 and is breaking the
osmo-bts usecase of forwarding an RSL message.
Add a test case that fails without the new code. I would prefer if
we could get rid of the manipulating the msgb like this, it is prone
to errors like this one.
|
|
Verify the output, accept two known errors in the generation of it.
|
|
This is testing the establishment of two ends (BTS, MS) one is in
the polling mode as used by osmo-bts. Transfer data between the two
ends. The sent data is not verified though. This should be followed
up soon.
|
